There is a standard template for these emails.

Anonymous wrote:The secretiveness is just feeding the rumor mill.

This.

Hey please post your most creative story on what you think happened.

The secretiveness is just feeding the rumor mill.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on, PP. How can we just move on? Have our kids had contact with this teacher?

How about you ask your 10, 11, 12 or 13 year old?

We don’t even know who the teacher is.

Ok, I will spoon feed this to you:

"Deal middle school child, have you heard anything around school about (taken directly from body of email): alleged sexual misconduct with a student by a staff member?"

Seriously? It’s unreasonable for people to post here looking for details... because they should be getting them through the 11 year old rumor mill? And that rumor mill will accurately establish the identity of the teacher and whether their own child has been affected? What is wrong with you? An unnamed staff member being accused of misconduct without any follow up about how they are handling/what grades may have been affected/info that they are privately reaching out to families that could have been affected/anything at all is certainly not sufficient for this kind of thing and the middle school rumor mill is not an adequate substitute for direct, transparent communication from the administration.

Yes

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on, PP. How can we just move on? Have our kids had contact with this teacher?

How about you ask your 10, 11, 12 or 13 year old?

We don’t even know who the teacher is.

Ok, I will spoon feed this to you:

"Deal middle school child, have you heard anything around school about (taken directly from body of email): alleged sexual misconduct with a student by a staff member?"

Seriously? It’s unreasonable for people to post here looking for details... because they should be getting them through the 11 year old rumor mill? And that rumor mill will accurately establish the identity of the teacher and whether their own child has been affected? What is wrong with you? An unnamed staff member being accused of misconduct without any follow up about how they are handling/what grades may have been affected/info that they are privately reaching out to families that could have been affected/anything at all is certainly not sufficient for this kind of thing and the middle school rumor mill is not an adequate substitute for direct, transparent communication from the administration.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on, PP. How can we just move on? Have our kids had contact with this teacher?

How about you ask your 10, 11, 12 or 13 year old?

We don’t even know who the teacher is.

Ok, I will spoon feed this to you:

"Deal middle school child, have you heard anything around school about (taken directly from body of email): alleged sexual misconduct with a student by a staff member?"

Or if the teacher is guilty

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Come on, PP. How can we just move on? Have our kids had contact with this teacher?

How about you ask your 10, 11, 12 or 13 year old?

We don’t even know who the teacher is.

Well actually I have no idea if my kid did or not. I find cryptic emails unhelpful

Anonymous wrote:Come on, PP. How can we just move on? Have our kids had contact with this teacher?

How about you ask your 10, 11, 12 or 13 year old?

Absolutely full transparency is needed.

Nope.

If there was a child exposed to sexual misconduct then there needs to be full transparency to determine if any other child/children were abused.

Duh.

Come on, PP. How can we just move on? Have our kids had contact with this teacher?

If it doesn't directly affect you there is no reason to know details. I asked both my 6th and 7th graders, neither one heard anything.

The school is handling it and the school community has been notified, move on.

Just got a typically cryptic email from the principle about sexual misconduct by a staff member- what’s going on?