Anonymous wrote:Incandescent light bulbs will shine again … scoffers must be too young to remember them.

The incandescents are prettier. But they give everyone an orange look. He's got it wrong. Quelle surprise.

I hated compact fluorescent bulbs. They have mercury inside them, were very expensive compared to incandescent lights, and two of them got so hot in their sockets that the plastic parts of the bulbs melted and started smoking. And in top of that, you can't even put them in the trash when they quit working. You have to take them to the Montgomery waste transfer station in Gaithersburg and put them in hazardous waste bins. All to save 70% energy over a regular bulb.


We converted everything to LED's as soon as they hit the market.

He's right about lightbilbs. We should've skipped CFL's altogether, and stayed with incandescent until LED's were ready.

I can't even fathom how many tons of mercury will wind up in our drinking water because of people throwing compact fluorescent light bulbs in regular trash.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me suggest more fiber.

That is not the problem.

It is true that newer toilets need to be flushed multiple times. Kind of defeats the purpose of "low-flow" toilets.

Never had a problem with it. More fiber.

Clearly time for the 25th Amendment since impeachment is not going anywhere fast .......

Incandescent light bulbs will shine again … scoffers must be too young to remember them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me suggest more fiber.

That is not the problem.

It is true that newer toilets need to be flushed multiple times. Kind of defeats the purpose of "low-flow" toilets.

No, those are the old new toilets. The new new toilets work fine.

But this isn't something I would ramble on about in front of the press. Personally.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let me suggest more fiber.

That is not the problem.

It is true that newer toilets need to be flushed multiple times. Kind of defeats the purpose of "low-flow" toilets.

1. I have a brand new toilet and have never once had to flush it 10-15 times.
2. I cannot fathom what the EPA would do about having to flush the toilet more than once.
2. GMAFB with you trying to make as if what Trump said has any bearing to reality. Just G F Y with that sht, so to speak.

He was rambling and whining about lightbulbs a couple of years ago, wasn't he?

Anonymous wrote:Let me suggest more fiber.

That is not the problem.

It is true that newer toilets need to be flushed multiple times. Kind of defeats the purpose of "low-flow" toilets.

Let me suggest more fiber.

Sorry, I guess he wasn't just complaining about the WH toilets - but people having to flush 10 or 15 times more generally, and having the EPA "looking into that very strongly, at my suggestion"

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1203050874358181888

I guess when the EPA isn't protecting the environment, they're left with Trump's enormous fast food shts to worry about

Very good brain

This really is an indictment of McDonalds and KFC. 10-15 flushes to get it down?

He's also complaining about the WH toilets having to be flushed more than once

https://twitter.com/jeffmason1/status/1203038357179289606

Trump expresses frustration about water efficiency, says sinks don’t have enough pressure and people have to flush toilets multiple times. He says he has directed the EPA to look at opening up water standards. It’s called rain, he says, referring to states with lots of water.

This seems pretty normal

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1203049053317160960

Trump: "The light bulb. They got rid of the light bulb that people got used to ... It doesn't make you look as good. Being a vain person … I don't want an orange look ... We'll have to change those bulbs out at least a couple of rooms where I am in the White House." Via CSPAN