Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the comment about DA/ECNL ruining HS soccer is accurate. Club soccer was always huge but once the top athletes pulled out of soccer, club became the defacto place to play and if you did not play, you did not get recruited for college. It is not even a money issue, i.e. paying club fees or a coach. The issue is the leagues and extensive travel. Most people can afford the fees and if they can't there is a way to get some help. The issue is the insane travel and tournaments.
Get rid of all the stupid leagues and just have one league nationally. Stop with all of the tournaments and showcases. The sport has become a pure money grab and the parents are stupid enough to keep feeding it.
Reality check:
we live in a large country. One league cannot possibly suit the needs of all
our economy is market driven. If people will pay, a market will arise
soccer is a popular youth sport
due to the above items, there will inevitably be many overlapping choices for youth soccer
just because the travel does not suit you, does not mean this entire piece of the market is stupid and should go away
your purchasing dollars count. If you don't like the offering, say it with your wallet.
there are plenty of local youth leagues for you to choose from
Agreed. And let’s face it. Zlatan is not a fan of anything not Zlatan.
Anonymous wrote:I think the comment about DA/ECNL ruining HS soccer is accurate. Club soccer was always huge but once the top athletes pulled out of soccer, club became the defacto place to play and if you did not play, you did not get recruited for college. It is not even a money issue, i.e. paying club fees or a coach. The issue is the leagues and extensive travel. Most people can afford the fees and if they can't there is a way to get some help. The issue is the insane travel and tournaments.
Get rid of all the stupid leagues and just have one league nationally. Stop with all of the tournaments and showcases. The sport has become a pure money grab and the parents are stupid enough to keep feeding it.
Anonymous wrote:This topic is absurd. Everything in life is pay to play. Nothing is "free". Maybe in the moment it's free (like public education or the Smithsonian), but somewhere, somehow, it's being paid for through taxes or whatever.
If you want your kid to participate in a sport, you should pay for it. It certainly should not be subsidized by the broader population. And just like everything else in the US, if you are poor and you are good at it, someone else will help pay for it.
Anonymous wrote:What you really want is a "coach, field, and travel for free program". Much better than "pay to play".
Anonymous wrote:Interesting piece here on the US model of youth football. Zlatan did an interview where he spoke about the Pay to Play system in the USA and why he is not a fan.
https://the18.com/soccer-news/zlatan-ibrahimovic-blasts-pay-to-play
Zlatan Ibrahimovic: ” It has to be said that the sport is expensive, very expensive. For example, in order for my children to play in a good football team, I have to pay $ 3,500 per child. It is not for the figure, but for the whole concept. I dislike it very much because not everyone has the money needed and the sport should be something for everyone, because it unites people of whatever origin. Pelé became a champion without anything, he played with a ball made of rags. Football is the finest sport in the world.” (translated from Italian here: https://www.gqitalia.it/news/article/zlatan-ibrahimovic-torna-in-italia-intervista-foto-video#intcid=recommendations_gq-it-similar_bc68db15-4d9f-47e2-9f76-0f30959b5291_cral2-1 )