Anonymous
01/08/2020 12:55
Subject: Re:ERA AFTER previously becoming pregnant?
not a personal experience, but i know someone who did ERA and had a successful pregnancy, and then when ttc #2, had no luck. they repeated the ERA and the transfer time changed. needed less time of progesterone.
Hope this helps some.
Hope this helps some.
Anonymous
12/08/2019 15:37
Subject: Re:ERA AFTER previously becoming pregnant?
Anonymous wrote:Yes, still waiting on results. I was on the fence about it. I didn't want to spend the extra time or take any more drugs
It added many months to the process and drugs -- not as bad as IVF by any measure
the decision depends - in part- on how many embryos you have left. I wanted to maximize my chances (and conversely not to worry that I had not done all that I could)
For some portion of women, it is important and for the rest of us, it makes no difference. I am not sure what camp that I fall into but my guess would be the latter.
OP here. This is helpful- we have four more, but have already been through a lot (9) of embryos to get our two live births and three miscarriages, so I think we’re just going to bite the bullet. I know I’m so lucky to have had so many embryos (I was young and had tubal issues after a bad ectopic Pre IVF) but I also don’t want to feel like I’m “wasting” the last four when we would still like one or two more kids.
Anonymous
12/03/2019 10:54
Subject: Re:ERA AFTER previously becoming pregnant?
Yes, still waiting on results. I was on the fence about it. I didn't want to spend the extra time or take any more drugs
It added many months to the process and drugs -- not as bad as IVF by any measure
the decision depends - in part- on how many embryos you have left. I wanted to maximize my chances (and conversely not to worry that I had not done all that I could)
For some portion of women, it is important and for the rest of us, it makes no difference. I am not sure what camp that I fall into but my guess would be the latter.
It added many months to the process and drugs -- not as bad as IVF by any measure
the decision depends - in part- on how many embryos you have left. I wanted to maximize my chances (and conversely not to worry that I had not done all that I could)
For some portion of women, it is important and for the rest of us, it makes no difference. I am not sure what camp that I fall into but my guess would be the latter.
Anonymous
12/02/2019 19:00
Subject: Re:ERA AFTER previously becoming pregnant?
Anonymous wrote:I did when I was with SGF but when we switched to CCRM they told us it was all hocus pocus so not sure who to believe.
Were they saying the whole thing was hocus pocus?
I just got an ERA done after one miscarriage and 1 failed transfer. They barely gave me much feedback after we got the results other than "yep, the timing of things looks good". I was pretty discouraged that there wasn't greater insight and if I hadn't done the ERA, we would've done everything timing wise the same anyways.
Anonymous
12/02/2019 10:41
Subject: Re:ERA AFTER previously becoming pregnant?
I did when I was with SGF but when we switched to CCRM they told us it was all hocus pocus so not sure who to believe.
Anonymous
12/01/2019 09:38
Subject: ERA AFTER previously becoming pregnant?
Has anyone had an ERA after becoming pregnant previously? Ie, years later?