Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No. Women get pregnant all the time and don’t marry so what.

Single moms and being proud of it was never so blatant. Even the 'supermodels' of the 90s didn't do it.

They got pregnant and had abortions because they were shamed for it. That is way worse.

Worse than bringing up a child in an unstable and potentially even detrimental environment?

I watch some of these influencers have kids and they clearly never realized that the child wouldn't be the same as the accessory dogs they tote around for fun in their purses.

The influencers money is dependent on being both available day/night for events, being able to get on a plane at the drop of a hat, and being sexually desirable (which includes the fantasy of not being tied down).

They're losing their incomes, can't move forward as influencers, and some of them even their marriages.

Look at Tammy Hembrow. She moved to LA in March and was back in Australia by July because she realized she just couldn't do it (take her career to the next level) with her two kids in tow.

Anonymous wrote:There are better reasons that the Kardashians are bad influences than being single moms.

Stop saying "spread their legs" what a gross term.

To you, so don’t use it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they are bad influences for more than just spreading their legs. And to be fair, Kim is married to the father of her children.

Can we do away with the term “spread your/her legs” in 2020?

You are more than welcome to “do away” with the term, but I won’t.

I agree. You have to spread your legs to keep your husband it’s just a fact about being a woman

There are better reasons that the Kardashians are bad influences than being single moms.

Stop saying "spread their legs" what a gross term.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No. Women get pregnant all the time and don’t marry so what.

Single moms and being proud of it was never so blatant. Even the 'supermodels' of the 90s didn't do it.

They got pregnant and had abortions because they were shamed for it. That is way worse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think they are bad influences for more than just spreading their legs. And to be fair, Kim is married to the father of her children.

Can we do away with the term “spread your/her legs” in 2020?

You are more than welcome to “do away” with the term, but I won’t.

Anonymous wrote:When you think about a homeless vet on the street, and then how much money these lowlifes have, it's enough to make you sick.

+1

Anonymous wrote:Oh look, a debate about the ethics of being a single mom is about to start.

I don't think being a single mom is wrong. I think starting out a child's life at a deficit deliberately and ESPECIALLY when these Kardashian-style women don't have an income to support their kids or their households is wrong.

For the record - I think shows like Teen Mom are also horrible influences.

Anonymous wrote:I think they are bad influences for more than just spreading their legs. And to be fair, Kim is married to the father of her children.

Can we do away with the term “spread your/her legs” in 2020?

Oh look, a debate about the ethics of being a single mom is about to start.

I think they are bad influences for more than just spreading their legs. And to be fair, Kim is married to the father of her children.

Anonymous wrote:No. Women get pregnant all the time and don’t marry so what.

Single moms and being proud of it was never so blatant. Even the 'supermodels' of the 90s didn't do it.

No. Women get pregnant all the time and don’t marry so what.

When you think about a homeless vet on the street, and then how much money these lowlifes have, it's enough to make you sick.

All of their friends are pregnant...none with husbands or even acknowledged baby daddys in the picture.

Weird you have the time to get pregnant but not to marry the man who made the baby?

Natalie Halcro (Kim Kardashian BFF)


Malika Haqq (Khloe Kardashian BFF)