Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I have three so I’m not opposed to bigger families, but it doesn’t sound like you want one. It’s perfectly wonderful to have two kids. No need to suffer through anything. Just enjoy your baby.
+1 maybe you would enjoy the baby stage more if you had time to enjoy your kids rather than popping them out to “get this stage over with.”
Hmmmm - interesting feedback. I just hate the first 6mo or so and then it’s ok until they drop to 1 nap and then it’s amazing. Both of mine had lots of breastfeeding issues, sleep issues, and in general I feel like the first 6 months is just constantly trying to get them to eat or sleep and everyone crying. I figured by the time #3 got here, 1 and 2 would be on the same schedule (one nap a day, walking around) and could stick together with a care giver while the baby stayed home. I could get let’s of help to care for the baby (very close Inlaws who wish they could just have all my kids move in with them forever, ability to hire help) so that could ease some of the awfulness.
I guess what I’m trying to think through is how beyond less sleep is it awful. I know someone will say “it’s a whole additional person” but before having 1 it was hard to imagine why a baby is tough, before having a second it wasn’t really on my radar that the second would make the first more difficult just bc of his adjusting to baby, so I’m trying to understand my blind spots
I want a 3rd bc kids are awesome, I want to raise another person and kids my kids siblings for a warm home life long term (not a guarantee I know). I just hate all the ways the first year limits your life if they’re difficult babies so I wouldn’t want to get to the stage of like a 4 and 5 year old and then have to go back to no travel, lots of naps,etc