Anonymous wrote:I will note that all DACA does is protect them from deportation and make them eligible for work permits. It does NOT make them citizens.
The DREAM act provides a path to citizenship for them. Not automatic citizenship, but rather a path to it.
Anonymous wrote:The issue is they could get deported back to a country they don’t know or have any connection to. This gives them safety. What’s your problem with that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This does seem overly complicated to me. If my parents stood money from a bank or embezzled a bunch of money and gave it me I do not get to keep it; or do I?
I just do not see what the big deal is to have the kids go through the normal immigration process, or am I missing some other part of this debate?
I am assuming you are asking these questions genuinely. Suppose you adopt a child from say, China, and bring that child (may be months old or a toddler) into the U.S. for living with you. The child had no say in your bringing the child to the U.S. Then you bring the child up to be an adult in the U.S. The child knows only the American society and life in the U.S. All known people to the child are in the U.S. only. The child never visited China, doesn't know anyone in China, and may or may not speak Chinese language. After the child became an adult, having graduated from a college, gainfully employed, and never committed any crime, suppose the Government says you should send the now adult back to China (suppose your earlier adoption process had a flaw and so deemed invalid) and should follow existing immigration procedures to come back to the U.S. and not rely on your sponsorship (since parents of DACA children are themselves unauthorized to live in the U.S. they can't sponsor DACA children for U.S. citizenship).
How would you feel? How would your now grown adopted son/daughter feel?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are missing the human part. Sadly, there is no cure for you.
This is just a typical emotional appeal. Can't this logic be used to run America into the ground dispensing more "humanity"? There are innumerable evils in the world. America can't be responsible for curing all of them. The argument is one of degree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are missing the human part. Sadly, there is no cure for you.
This is just a typical emotional appeal. Can't this logic be used to run America into the ground dispensing more "humanity"? There are innumerable evils in the world. America can't be responsible for curing all of them. The argument is one of degree.
Anonymous wrote:This does seem overly complicated to me. If my parents stood money from a bank or embezzled a bunch of money and gave it me I do not get to keep it; or do I?
I just do not see what the big deal is to have the kids go through the normal immigration process, or am I missing some other part of this debate?
Anonymous wrote:You are missing the human part. Sadly, there is no cure for you.
Anonymous wrote:This does seem overly complicated to me. If my parents stood money from a bank or embezzled a bunch of money and gave it me I do not get to keep it; or do I?
I just do not see what the big deal is to have the kids go through the normal immigration process, or am I missing some other part of this debate?