Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They pay to rent those fields...move on.
For every club that rents a nice school field there are two others making do in the corner of some grass park.
Prioritization preference.
Anonymous wrote:They pay to rent those fields...move on.
Anonymous wrote:Clubs usually pay the non-profit rental fee which is very minimal.
Anonymous wrote:BRYC trains and Robinson and Woodson and I know some of the coaches discourage kids from playing HS
Anonymous wrote:Given the shortage of fields, is it right that private clubs use public school fields for practices eventhough they specifically say the kids on that team cannot play for the school? Shouldn't the school facilities be to benefit the kids that are there and are playing for the school instead of a private corporation seeking profits?
I know some DA teams train on public recreation facilities, but there are others that use school fields for their practices. Any thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Given the shortage of fields, is it right that private clubs use public school fields for practices eventhough they specifically say the kids on that team cannot play for the school? Shouldn't the school facilities be to benefit the kids that are there and are playing for the school instead of a private corporation seeking profits?
I know some DA teams train on public recreation facilities, but there are others that use school fields for their practices. Any thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:Given the shortage of fields, is it right that private clubs use public school fields for practices eventhough they specifically say the kids on that team cannot play for the school? Shouldn't the school facilities be to benefit the kids that are there and are playing for the school instead of a private corporation seeking profits?
I know some DA teams train on public recreation facilities, but there are others that use school fields for their practices. Any thoughts?