Anonymous wrote:Mine are two years apart and learned to swim, tie shoes, and ride bikes at the same time. I explained to my older kid that his sister had the advantage of watching him learn and practice and struggle. She also saw him trying these things and didn't want her brother to be able to do anything she couldn't. He had no such motivation! I think it's pretty normal, actually, and it might be helpful to explain it in those terms.
1000x this. My sister and I are 21 months apart and did everything together. We even got our teeth and periods at the same time. She learned to read when I did. She was a huge suck-up to adults. (I don’t think adults actually took it this way. But maybe like your dd she really enjoyed getting praise). She is not more intelligent than I—proven over and over by standardized testing. It was actually annoying because I’d get a 1400 on the SAT and it was assumed my sister would do better. She never actually did. She also is bipolar, so she may be intelligent but impaired by the mental illness.
My point is don’t call your ds bright and your dd exceptionally smart. The both sound normal. The can both push each other. The dd was ants to keep up with the ds. And the dd can push the ds.
Your dd doesn’t sound like a wonder kid. Both my kids swam at 3. Didn’t use training wheels at just turned 4, and could sound out words at 3. One was reading chapter books before turning 4. They have high average to gifted IQ and different strengths and weaknesses.