Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our kid is in the math/sci program and went through zero wringers. If you put your kids through a wringer, that's on you.
I am surprised by your confidence. "Zero wringers?" I wonder what your child would say, if you asked them how they felt during the process, or if they would actually tell you. Did your child somehow not have to participate, didn't have to test, didn't have to write an essay, didn't have to ask teachers for recommendations, didn't care how things turned out? The stress is there without the parent placing it there. I hope your parenting prowess is as great as you believe it to be, but I doubt it. Congrats that things worked out so well for your child, but if they hadn't worked out, would she we be all goo with it? "Zero wringers"....Really???
+many. Yeah that response made me roll my eyes. Somehow reminds me of parents posting “my kid got a 26 on ACT!! NO PREP!”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids have been in MCPS magnet programs from ES to HS. The admission process is not easy and yes it is stressful because there are more qualified applicants than seats. Recent changes that takes into account demographics has further penalized certain groups with high performing kids. It is what it is.
Both my DSs are Asian-American, non-FARMS and non-ESOL. We live in UpCounty and are financially a donut-hole family. Children are STEM students. Education and EC activities have taken a big part of our focus. It looks effortless to people when they see our kids getting and excelling in these programs, but it is all due to luck and years of making education a priority. The admission process is also difficult because it evaluates skills and achievements that are gained after putting in effort for a long time. It also takes something out of parents because our energy, effort and money is being taken up with these kinds of activities.
Doing well in school and standardized testing happens due to the discipline of daily studies and practice. Doing well in EC activities happen because of the tedious nature of daily work and practice. And when you apply - you take all of that and combine it with meeting the deadlines of writing essays, gathering credentials, asking for recommendations, not having disciplinary issues at school, being held in high regard by your teachers and having a history of doing well, documented with the school system. In other words, your MAP and PARCC and other tests also mark you as being advanced. This is a long marathon and not a sprint. It is stressful in many ways because anytime you work towards a goal, you are aware that failure can also happen despite your best efforts.
For me as a parent, the big stressor is how to make sure that the kids are doing what they need to do to succeed, while keeping in mind to be strategic and guide them in a way that reduces their stress and harnesses their interests and strengths. Every kid is different and what motivates and works for one child may not work for another.
Got to disagree with you a bit here, though I agree with some parts. Like I agree it's a marathon and not a sprint. But I disagree very much with your statement about how doing well on standardized tests happens due to discipline and practice. It has a lot to do with luck, and just the kind of brain you happen to have. I am one of those people who just did pretty well on standardized tests without effort. (This did not translate to career success.) My sons are the same. My older son has done brilliantly on his standardized tests not because of discipline and practice. He didn't prep (though I know the folks on here don't believe that) It's just that those tests happen to test for the kind of intelligence he has in spades. Yes, a little might be related to upbringing, mostly in making sure he exercised a lot and ate well, got a lot of time outdoors and enough sleep, and wasn't allowed much screen time. I think those things kept his anxiety in check, and if he were a more anxious kid he probably wouldn't test as well. I think a good, stable home environment help prep for these kinds of tests much more than any diligent prep-work. I see too many kids too stressed out because their parents have them do tons of test-prep and extra-curriculars. I wish our schools had more accelerated tracks in the regular high schools, as many more kids could benefit from these magnet programs than get in. To answer the question if the magnet programs are worth it... it really depends on your child. Some kids aren't happy in the Blair magnet because they find it too competitive, too pressured, too much work. If they truly love the subject matter, it's a great place to be.
Anonymous wrote:The lackluster U.S. News & World Report rankings of MD public high schools and the omission of any mention of its magnets, makes me question whether it is worth the trouble to put your kid through the wringer to get into these programs I also wonder whether trying to position your child to compete for limited slots in a magnet program is a way of distracting parents from the broader problem, a lack of availability of advanced classes. Rather than challenge the school's niggardly distribution of advanced courses, we instead spend all of our time and energy posturing our kids to be the ones who have access. Whether Johnny has the right extra curricular or the right relationships with teachers has nothing to do with assessing his ability to excel in particular advanced courses offered through these programs. If the kid can do the work he should have access to the course. But instead of attacking the school's course offerings, we are mired in the process of making our children the most desirable candidate he can be; so that, its someone else's kid who gets left behind. And at the end of the day do we even have a measure of whether this process helps our kids get into better colleges or to excel wherever they end up going.
I don't know if my perspective distorted or not. So, I am interested in hearing your views.
Anonymous wrote:My kids have been in MCPS magnet programs from ES to HS. The admission process is not easy and yes it is stressful because there are more qualified applicants than seats. Recent changes that takes into account demographics has further penalized certain groups with high performing kids. It is what it is.
Both my DSs are Asian-American, non-FARMS and non-ESOL. We live in UpCounty and are financially a donut-hole family. Children are STEM students. Education and EC activities have taken a big part of our focus. It looks effortless to people when they see our kids getting and excelling in these programs, but it is all due to luck and years of making education a priority. The admission process is also difficult because it evaluates skills and achievements that are gained after putting in effort for a long time. It also takes something out of parents because our energy, effort and money is being taken up with these kinds of activities.
Doing well in school and standardized testing happens due to the discipline of daily studies and practice. Doing well in EC activities happen because of the tedious nature of daily work and practice. And when you apply - you take all of that and combine it with meeting the deadlines of writing essays, gathering credentials, asking for recommendations, not having disciplinary issues at school, being held in high regard by your teachers and having a history of doing well, documented with the school system. In other words, your MAP and PARCC and other tests also mark you as being advanced. This is a long marathon and not a sprint. It is stressful in many ways because anytime you work towards a goal, you are aware that failure can also happen despite your best efforts.
For me as a parent, the big stressor is how to make sure that the kids are doing what they need to do to succeed, while keeping in mind to be strategic and guide them in a way that reduces their stress and harnesses their interests and strengths. Every kid is different and what motivates and works for one child may not work for another.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our kid is in the math/sci program and went through zero wringers. If you put your kids through a wringer, that's on you.
I am surprised by your confidence. "Zero wringers?" I wonder what your child would say, if you asked them how they felt during the process, or if they would actually tell you. Did your child somehow not have to participate, didn't have to test, didn't have to write an essay, didn't have to ask teachers for recommendations, didn't care how things turned out? The stress is there without the parent placing it there. I hope your parenting prowess is as great as you believe it to be, but I doubt it. Congrats that things worked out so well for your child, but if they hadn't worked out, would she we be all goo with it? "Zero wringers"....Really???
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The lackluster U.S. News & World Report rankings of MD public high schools and the omission of any mention of its magnets, makes me question whether it is worth the trouble to put your kid through the wringer to get into these programs I also wonder whether trying to position your child to compete for limited slots in a magnet program is a way of distracting parents from the broader problem, a lack of availability of advanced classes. Rather than challenge the school's niggardly distribution of advanced courses, we instead spend all of our time and energy posturing our kids to be the ones who have access. Whether Johnny has the right extra curriculars or the right relationships with teachers has nothing to do with assessing his ability to excel in particular advanced courses offered through these programs. If the kid can do the work he should have access to the course. But instead of attacking the school's course offerings, we are mired in the process of making our children the most desirable candidate he can be; so that, its someone else's kid who gets left behind. And at the end of the day do we even have a measure of whether this process helps our kids get into better colleges or to excel wherever they end up going.
I don't know if my perspective distorted or not. So, I am interested in hearing your views.
This is a clear signal that you don't have kids in MCPS. The teacher reocmmendation and extracurriculars are no longer part of the review process, and hasn't been for several years.
OP here: Wrong on all counts madame prosecutor. I checked the HS applications for APEX and Blair this morning. Posting were from last year, because MCPS never gives timely information. They do include extracurriculars and recommendations. I do have a child at MCPS, not that it matters, because if I were moving here the same question would apply. What bit of paranoia or provincialism sparked this unhelpful nonresponse from you
Anonymous wrote:Our kid is in the math/sci program and went through zero wringers. If you put your kids through a wringer, that's on you.
Anonymous wrote:The lackluster U.S. News & World Report rankings of MD public high schools and the omission of any mention of its magnets, makes me question whether it is worth the trouble to put your kid through the wringer to get into these programs I also wonder whether trying to position your child to compete for limited slots in a magnet program is a way of distracting parents from the broader problem, a lack of availability of advanced classes. Rather than challenge the school's niggardly distribution of advanced courses, we instead spend all of our time and energy posturing our kids to be the ones who have access. Whether Johnny has the right extra curriculars or the right relationships with teachers has nothing to do with assessing his ability to excel in particular advanced courses offered through these programs. If the kid can do the work he should have access to the course. But instead of attacking the school's course offerings, we are mired in the process of making our children the most desirable candidate he can be; so that, its someone else's kid who gets left behind. And at the end of the day do we even have a measure of whether this process helps our kids get into better colleges or to excel wherever they end up going.
I don't know if my perspective distorted or not. So, I am interested in hearing your views.