Anonymous wrote:Wait I thought bone scans showed she was definitively like 30, lol why did they put her with a new couple????
Good luck to the new parents, they're gonna need it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The new family is going on the adoption bing, probably for the money. She comes with social security payments so its a win for the family and a win for her as she's taken care of.
If the previous adoptive family’s accusations are true she could be a danger to the current adoptive family.
Anonymous wrote:The new family is going on the adoption bing, probably for the money. She comes with social security payments so its a win for the family and a win for her as she's taken care of.
Anonymous wrote:I am so confused by the whole story. So she is or isn't really 30? Also it sounds like the original family got rid of her five years ago, so not sure why we're just now hearing about it/charges are being pressed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am so confused by the whole story. So she is or isn't really 30? Also it sounds like the original family got rid of her five years ago, so not sure why we're just now hearing about it/charges are being pressed.
They were the second family. The very first adoption fell through, then the family with the autistic child adopted her. Then another family camr forward but backed oout at the last minute. This new family is the fourth (unless there were more).
Anonymous wrote:I am so confused by the whole story. So she is or isn't really 30? Also it sounds like the original family got rid of her five years ago, so not sure why we're just now hearing about it/charges are being pressed.
Anonymous wrote:I am so confused by the whole story. So she is or isn't really 30? Also it sounds like the original family got rid of her five years ago, so not sure why we're just now hearing about it/charges are being pressed.