Anonymous wrote:Really pathetic attempt, OP. I’m embarrassed for you.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:500 leading scientists from around the globe, including US MIT astrophysicist with hundreds of published papers, released this letter to the UN yesterday:
First of all, there isn't a list of 500 names included with the letter. Instead, there are 14 well-known climate change deniers listed. The main organizer, Guus Berkhout, was formerly employed by Shell Oil. The "MIT astrophysicist", Richard Lindzen, hasn't worked for MIT since 2013 and now works for the CATO Institute. The rest are more of the same.
Basically, this is false advertising (there aren't 500 scientists listed) bought and paid for by right-wing crack pots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK, pay for your own flood damage. We tax payers are sick and tired of paying for your beach house restoration.
Funny you should mention that. I do have a beach house. And no, I do not expect taxpayers to bail us out if and when it falls into the sea. It's been nice while it lasted.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:500 leading scientists from around the globe, including US MIT astrophysicist with hundreds of published papers, released this letter to the UN yesterday:
First of all, there isn't a list of 500 names included with the letter. Instead, there are 14 well-known climate change deniers listed. The main organizer, Guus Berkhout, was formerly employed by Shell Oil. The "MIT astrophysicist", Richard Lindzen, hasn't worked for MIT since 2013 and now works for the CATO Institute. The rest are more of the same.
Basically, this is false advertising (there aren't 500 scientists listed) bought and paid for by right-wing crack pots.
The characterization of Lindzen as a contrarian has been reinforced by reports that he claims that lung cancer has only been weakly linked to smoking
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:500 leading scientists from around the globe, including US MIT astrophysicist with hundreds of published papers, released this letter to the UN yesterday:
First of all, there isn't a list of 500 names included with the letter. Instead, there are 14 well-known climate change deniers listed. The main organizer, Guus Berkhout, was formerly employed by Shell Oil. The "MIT astrophysicist", Richard Lindzen, hasn't worked for MIT since 2013 and now works for the CATO Institute. The rest are more of the same.
Basically, this is false advertising (there aren't 500 scientists listed) bought and paid for by right-wing crack pots.
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:500 leading scientists from around the globe, including US MIT astrophysicist with hundreds of published papers, released this letter to the UN yesterday:
First of all, there isn't a list of 500 names included with the letter. Instead, there are 14 well-known climate change deniers listed. The main organizer, Guus Berkhout, was formerly employed by Shell Oil. The "MIT astrophysicist", Richard Lindzen, hasn't worked for MIT since 2013 and now works for the CATO Institute. The rest are more of the same.
Basically, this is false advertising (there aren't 500 scientists listed) bought and paid for by right-wing crack pots.
Anonymous wrote:500 leading scientists from around the globe, including US MIT astrophysicist with hundreds of published papers, released this letter to the UN yesterday:
Anonymous wrote:500 leading scientists from around the globe, including US MIT astrophysicist with hundreds of published papers, released this letter to the UN yesterday:
https://clintel.nl/brief-clintel-aan-vn-baas-guterres/
Apologies if link not working; the gist of it is this:
The general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is at present founded are unfit for their purpose. Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models. Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.
We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation.
Your thoughts?
Anonymous wrote:OK, pay for your own flood damage. We tax payers are sick and tired of paying for your beach house restoration.