Anonymous wrote:Not economically viable.
Can you give me one could reason why DC SHOULD be a state, other than liking the way DC residents might vote?
Anonymous wrote:Not economically viable.
Can you give me one could reason why DC SHOULD be a state, other than liking the way DC residents might vote?
Anonymous wrote:Because they have no representation in Congress. No voice. Isn't that good enough?
It's not as if this is a secret. They are welcome to move to an existing state if they want Congressional representation.
Because they have no representation in Congress. No voice. Isn't that good enough?
Anonymous wrote:Not economically viable.
Can you give me one could reason why DC SHOULD be a state, other than liking the way DC residents might vote?
Anonymous wrote:Not economically viable.
Can you give me one could reason why DC SHOULD be a state, other than liking the way DC residents might vote?
Anonymous wrote:Are you suggesting that the reasons of the founding fathers remain valid? That giving DC residents Congressional representation would give them too much power?
That seems like a good reason to me. I like the idea of the nation's capital being located in a neutral territory. Why should it be a state? Do we need another state? If we really want to make it a state, wouldn't it make the most sense just to annex it back to Maryland, which donated the land in the first place?
Are you suggesting that the reasons of the founding fathers remain valid? That giving DC residents Congressional representation would give them too much power?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Other than not liking the way DC residents might vote? What could be the arguments against?
Oh my.
History 101.
Anonymous wrote:Other than not liking the way DC residents might vote? What could be the arguments against?