Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
https://mobile.twitter.com/DrGJackBrown/status/1137790124861808640

Here’s another image of the Dalmatian dress and now I just feel bad for Ivanka.


From that twitter thread... Check out the super weird video of Ivanka in this interview: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/femail/video-114...Ivankas-childhood-bedroom.html

Her demeanor changes when she’s by her bed and it’s soooo creepy. I almost feel bad for her! But not quite.


This was legitimately disturbing. I will admit I know nothing at all about body language.


Putting the pieces together... Ivanka’s mask breaking in the video when she is near her childhood bed, her stance next to her father and a bed, his ridiculous sexualizing of her and telling the View that all they had in common is “sex,” the creepy pictures of him and her as a child all over...

It’s right in front of our faces, isn’t it? He’s practically admitted to it.

Pg 177/178

Anonymous wrote:Those posts are disgusting and pervasive within the thread. I avoid the thread become of it and can’t imagine who posts such things. It’s straight up fantasizing about pedophilia.

I just went through the last five pages and there was only one such post. In another thread similar to this one, a poster similarly claimed that there were a bunch of inappropriate posts (I can't remember the exact reason that they were inappropriate) and I went through 10 pages then and only found one. So forgive me if I am getting a bit skeptical about the claims made in these threads.

Those posts are disgusting and pervasive within the thread. I avoid the thread become of it and can’t imagine who posts such things. It’s straight up fantasizing about pedophilia.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:It's not that those posts have been allowed to stand, but that they haven't been reported. Despite what is apparently believed, I don't spend a lot of time worrying about Ivanka's fashion choices so I don't really read that thread.

I wasn’t imagining you spent much time there. Just asking for clarification since a bunch were allowed to stay in a thread in politics, too.

The same answer applies there as well. If I have removed such posts in the past, I am very likely to remove them in the presence as well. But, I have to know about them.

jsteele wrote:It's not that those posts have been allowed to stand, but that they haven't been reported. Despite what is apparently believed, I don't spend a lot of time worrying about Ivanka's fashion choices so I don't really read that thread.

I wasn’t imagining you spent much time there. Just asking for clarification since a bunch were allowed to stay in a thread in politics, too.

jsteele wrote:It's not that those posts have been allowed to stand, but that they haven't been reported. Despite what is apparently believed, I don't spend a lot of time worrying about Ivanka's fashion choices so I don't really read that thread.

It's not that those posts have been allowed to stand, but that they haven't been reported. Despite what is apparently believed, I don't spend a lot of time worrying about Ivanka's fashion choices so I don't really read that thread.

I have a question about posts speculating on the nature of the relationship between Ivanka and her dad. I just posted one in the Trump fashion mishaps thread and I wondered. Back in 2016 during the RNC when Trump looked like he was grabbing Ivanka’s hips and leering at her chest, you deleted posts that suggested that there was something inappropriate between these two, but about 50 pages ago in Trump Fashion Mishaps regarding Ivanka’s body language in the bunker with her father and a few times since, they have been allowed to stand. Is that because you feel like we can post these things because you think there’s some fire beneath the smoke or are you just outta gas regarding them? I don’t want to keep posting these things if you don’t want us to. So... fair-ish game if we’re not disgusting or still outside the bounds?