Anonymous wrote:Isn’t Barnard basically Columbia now? On the same path as Radcliffe?Anonymous wrote:How about Barnard? Is it any different than Smith in this respect? Barnard doesn’t seem to share similar reputation.
Anonymous wrote:To the extent she feels a bit out of place at times, I don’t think it’s the worst thing for someone with the privilege of always being in the majority to get a better understanding of what it’s like to be in the minority.
Anonymous wrote:1. She will be fine. Yes, there is a significant percentage of the student body that doesn’t identify as both heterosexual and cis-gendered, but the social scene does not revolve around gender identity and sexuality.
2. To the extent she feels a bit out of place at times, I don’t think it’s the worst thing for someone with the privilege of always being in the majority to get a better understanding of what it’s like to be in the minority.
Isn’t Barnard basically Columbia now? On the same path as Radcliffe?Anonymous wrote:How about Barnard? Is it any different than Smith in this respect? Barnard doesn’t seem to share similar reputation.
The plurality if not majority of students are cis gandered and straight. She will still be in the majority.Anonymous wrote:DD liked Smith a lot (great school, beautiful campus, cosy feel, great town, family members have attended in earlier decades). But she is worried that as a straight cis-gendered woman she might feel out of place. (She was told that more than half of current smith students identify as LGBTQ). She is very comfortable with that community but worries that someone not part of it will have fewer social opportunistic and will feel more isolated. Can anyone with recent experience with Smith comment? DD is not by any stretch a political conservative but she is in some ways a fairly conventional kid (she is also interested in several southern schools, is possibly interested in joining a sorority, etc).