Anonymous
09/01/2019 14:33
Subject: Re:WaPo Complicit in Corruption of DC Council’s Corporate ‘Concierge’
One aspect of media bias that cannot be understated is bias of omission. It is amazing how many stories that are damning to some are not reported on by media organizations deemed as "reputable."
Some will respond that media organizations don't have the time and personnel to report on ALL stories. To that retort, I say, "LOL!"
Some will respond that media organizations don't have the time and personnel to report on ALL stories. To that retort, I say, "LOL!"
Anonymous
09/01/2019 13:59
Subject: Re:WaPo Complicit in Corruption of DC Council’s Corporate ‘Concierge’
And the WaPo finally published an article on Maret and Jelleff without a sentence on the role of Jack Evans. Curiouser and curiouser.
Anonymous
08/30/2019 04:05
Subject: WaPo Complicit in Corruption of DC Council’s Corporate ‘Concierge’
Interesting article about how the Washington Post kept silent about the corruption of Jack Evans, despite ample evidence. Might explain why they've been so quiet about the Maret/Jellef sweetheart deal renewal that Evans is rumored to have brokered.
https://fair.org/home/wapo-complicit-in-corruption-of-dc-councils-corporate-concierge/
https://fair.org/home/wapo-complicit-in-corruption-of-dc-councils-corporate-concierge/
When the FBI came knocking on DC Councilmember Jack Evans’ door in June, it set off an earthquake in local politics and business.
Over his 28 years on the DC Council, Evans has served as “concierge” for the elite, steering gobs of public money to stadiums, arenas and luxury condos. Along the way, it wasn’t just developers and banks that profited; so did Evans.
Evidence of Evans’ corruption abounded for many years, just not in the pages of the influential Washington Post, which has long protected the councilmember. But with a growing federal investigation of Evans, the Post finally ended its silence; over the past months, the paper has consistently reported on Evans’ misconduct. Since then, Evans—until recently DC’s third-most powerful official—has been reprimanded, fined and stripped of his committee chair positions.
The Post frequently credits its own reporting for the quickening pace of events, which is fair, and underscores the paper’s complicity in keeping Evans in office all these years. Once the Post ended its silence, Evans’ career began to unravel.