Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anybody who asks this question hasn't lived in SV and fundamentally doesn't understand the unique mix of economic conditions that have resulted in what it is today. No city is even a close 2nd.
OP here, I grew up in Palo Alto and Went to JLS, Gunn High. I saw my parent's shitbox go from 600k to 2.5 million in real time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NoVA is nowhere near SV level prices. Its never going to reach those levels.
1. Geography- SV's geography makes expansion next to impossible -bay, mountains and areas that structurally or environmentally can't be built up enclose a small area. There are few roads in and out of SV so communities further out involve multi hour commutes. Public transportation is limited to BART or Caltrain. NoVA can expand out has better highway access in multiple directions than SV.
2. Rents are outrageous. Inventories for rentals is so low that people are paying more than they would on a 1M+ montage for rentals. There aren't many high rises and many restrictions on building high up unlike NoVA. NOVA and DC have tons of high rises.
3.Lower income and less expensive counties are nearby like PG and MoCo. The commutes to the cheaper areas are still way less than commute from say Gilroy (which now sells in the 1Ms) to SV.
4. Inventory turn over. In SV people age in place because the taxes freeze when you buy your house. They can't afford to move on a fixed income. The weather and one story houses make again in place more practical. Some people do cash out and move to Nevada or Arizona but lots just stay put. In NOVA and the surrounding areas retirees move out sooner.
All of this. Especially number 4. I'm thankful we don't have that kind of tax structure here. B/c the unintended consequences are CRAZY.
Anonymous wrote:NoVA is nowhere near SV level prices. Its never going to reach those levels.
1. Geography- SV's geography makes expansion next to impossible -bay, mountains and areas that structurally or environmentally can't be built up enclose a small area. There are few roads in and out of SV so communities further out involve multi hour commutes. Public transportation is limited to BART or Caltrain. NoVA can expand out has better highway access in multiple directions than SV.
2. Rents are outrageous. Inventories for rentals is so low that people are paying more than they would on a 1M+ montage for rentals. There aren't many high rises and many restrictions on building high up unlike NoVA. NOVA and DC have tons of high rises.
3.Lower income and less expensive counties are nearby like PG and MoCo. The commutes to the cheaper areas are still way less than commute from say Gilroy (which now sells in the 1Ms) to SV.
4. Inventory turn over. In SV people age in place because the taxes freeze when you buy your house. They can't afford to move on a fixed income. The weather and one story houses make again in place more practical. Some people do cash out and move to Nevada or Arizona but lots just stay put. In NOVA and the surrounding areas retirees move out sooner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Silicon Valley and Seattle are nice so they command high prices. NOVA is mostly a dump so will never get to their level.
Being "nice" has nothing to do with commanding high prices. Supply and demand does. The vast majority of San Francisco is a dump with drug addicts and homeless people crapping on the sidewalk in front of your $1.8 million run down townhouse. The schools are crap and the government is dysfunctional. Yet rent is $3500 for a 1 BR that hasn't had a bathroom update since the 50's.
The only thing nice about SF is the weather.
Anonymous wrote:Silicon Valley and Seattle are nice so they command high prices. NOVA is mostly a dump so will never get to their level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anybody who asks this question hasn't lived in SV and fundamentally doesn't understand the unique mix of economic conditions that have resulted in what it is today. No city is even a close 2nd.
OP here, I grew up in Palo Alto and Went to JLS, Gunn High. I saw my parent's shitbox go from 600k to 2.5 million in real time.
Anonymous wrote:
We aren’t surrounded by water.
neither is San Jose
Anonymous wrote:Anybody who asks this question hasn't lived in SV and fundamentally doesn't understand the unique mix of economic conditions that have resulted in what it is today. No city is even a close 2nd.
Anonymous wrote:We don’t get foreign investors.
Anonymous wrote:We aren’t surrounded by water.
Anonymous wrote:Nowhere near the level of NIMBYism and property rights much stronger.
Anonymous wrote:And tech companies aren’t huge here, just auxiliary.