Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would get rid of it but I doubt they will. It’s awful that buyers can access the exact number of poor children in each area, so they’re sure to avoid them.
Do you think people are confused which parts have the poor families?
Before 2005 or so, do you think you knew the precise percentage of FARMS and ESOL in every school? People knew the difference between Potomac and Silver Spring, but NO, they did not have this data.
Witness the ludicrous arguments a few years ago when Westland Middle School split off into Silver Creek Middle School. Both are prosperous, excellent schools serving Bethesda and Chevy Chase but there were freak-outs and hateful rhetoric because one school had 8% FARMS and one school had 20%.
This. And I think they need to stop posting the demographics across racial groups too. Sadly, lots of people purposely seek out schools that have the least number of Black/Hispanic students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would get rid of it but I doubt they will. It’s awful that buyers can access the exact number of poor children in each area, so they’re sure to avoid them.
Do you think people are confused which parts have the poor families?
Before 2005 or so, do you think you knew the precise percentage of FARMS and ESOL in every school? People knew the difference between Potomac and Silver Spring, but NO, they did not have this data.
Witness the ludicrous arguments a few years ago when Westland Middle School split off into Silver Creek Middle School. Both are prosperous, excellent schools serving Bethesda and Chevy Chase but there were freak-outs and hateful rhetoric because one school had 8% FARMS and one school had 20%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would get rid of it but I doubt they will. It’s awful that buyers can access the exact number of poor children in each area, so they’re sure to avoid them.
Do you think people are confused which parts have the poor families?
Anonymous wrote:I wish they would get rid of it but I doubt they will. It’s awful that buyers can access the exact number of poor children in each area, so they’re sure to avoid them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish they would get rid of it but I doubt they will. It’s awful that buyers can access the exact number of poor children in each area, so they’re sure to avoid them.
Hopefully they can balance this out with the new boundaries.
Anonymous wrote:I wish they would get rid of it but I doubt they will. It’s awful that buyers can access the exact number of poor children in each area, so they’re sure to avoid them.
Anonymous wrote:Doesn't this mainly provide statistics from the PARCC test which the state decided wasn't helpful?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you check all the schools or just yours?
There's a pulldown menu that says "Display Data for Year:" and the most recent year option is 2017-18...
Anonymous wrote:Did you check all the schools or just yours?