Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m tired of hearing the “a man would never write this article” response. What about the merits versus ”whataboutism”? And I believe many men would think this way nowadays. Men have really changed in the levels of parenting and child-focus in even the last generation.
Well, it continues to be true. So until men actually start writing this article, we'll keep saying it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lara Bazelon does REALLY important work, and a man would never even think to write this article, of course. Also, the headline does not reflect the actual article.
This article made me tear up a little to think about the sacrifices I have made, though. Prior to having kids, I worked at a civil rights law firm lead by women, and I transitioned in to government specifically because I saw how very, very difficult it was to raise kids as a litigator.
Now I'm dug into a boring government job, probably for life, where I think I make something of a difference, but not even close to working on actual innocence cases. Still, I know that I would never have the personal & family resources to lead her life.
This has NOTHING to do with "man hate." Men have written plenty of important articles about work/life balance. You need help when everything that comes out of your mouth starts with hatred of another human being.
Anonymous wrote:
She did the right thing. Who cares about a birthday party? And I say this as a stay at home mother who organizes great birthday parties. Her client is more important.
Anonymous wrote:I’m tired of hearing the “a man would never write this article” response. What about the merits versus ”whataboutism”? And I believe many men would think this way nowadays. Men have really changed in the levels of parenting and child-focus in even the last generation.
Anonymous wrote:Lara Bazelon does REALLY important work, and a man would never even think to write this article, of course. Also, the headline does not reflect the actual article.
This article made me tear up a little to think about the sacrifices I have made, though. Prior to having kids, I worked at a civil rights law firm lead by women, and I transitioned in to government specifically because I saw how very, very difficult it was to raise kids as a litigator.
Now I'm dug into a boring government job, probably for life, where I think I make something of a difference, but not even close to working on actual innocence cases. Still, I know that I would never have the personal & family resources to lead her life.
Anonymous wrote:Children do not need to come first when 1st means they need a birthday party. First means they need food, shelter, education and love/protection.
This is not new. Even women who “stayed home” cared for the animals on the farm and the garden. They did not coddle their child’s every need.
The endless need to coddle children’s every whim is the problem not missing a few ridiculous newly invented events in their life like the 100th day of school, K graduation, the endless need to go to a pumpkin patch every Fall.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/29/opinion/sunday/ive-picked-my-job-over-my-kids.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
Not sure how I felt about this article. I’m in medicine so def know that sometimes work comes before kids but this seems cruel.
“Sometimes my choices make me sad. My daughter’s seventh birthday was the worst. She cried, and I did everything I could not to. I felt sick to my stomach. But I had a trial starting the next day, six hours away.
I had picked the date, not the judge, because I knew that the other side wasn’t ready. Delaying even a few days would have meant losing a crucial advantage. I wasn’t going to risk it knowing what was on the line for my client.”