Anonymous wrote:I'm a Wellesley alum and have been an admissions interviewer in recent years. My impression -- and that of many of the other alum interviewers with whom I've spoken -- is that the college is swinging even more toward conventional, pre-professional students than in past years. I'm a lawyer, so I don't have a bias against students who are pre-law, but it's dismaying to see the college become more homogeneous. Additionally, when I speak with current students and recent grads, their description of social life sounds pretty grim -- not much of anything happening on campus on the weekends, so students leave in droves. (Again, this isn't a sharp departure from the past, but at least there used to be something of an on-campus social scene.) I got a great education at Wellesley, but I would not encourage a young woman to go there today. (For that reason, I'm no longer an alum interviewer).
Anonymous wrote:We* liked Mount Holyoke a lot. Heard it was the most nurturing of the group (Wellesley has the reputation of being a very competitive community). MHC is in a tiny town, but Amherst is just a bus-ride away. It does has a very social justice/gender fluid vibe...which may or may not appeal to your child.
*Yes, I said WE.
Anonymous wrote:The one difference we came up with in our search is that Bryn Mawr gives some merit aid and Wellesley gives none.
Neither ended up on my D's final list (Wellesley because of the aid and Bryn Mawr because she did not like it for some reason), and she'll be heading to Smith in the fall.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wellesley clearly has the superior quality students these days. These two used to be comparable but Bryn Mawr has slipped behind. No fault to Bryn Mawr, but just that the demand for all women's colleges is very small and the cream of the crop flock to Wellesley.
Academics at both are excellent. I'd venture to say that Bryn Mawr offers a great opportunity for a good student who wouldn't make the cut at Haverford or Swarthmore but to get access to the same quality education.
You didn’t even make a legitimate stab at answering OP’s question - just went straight to the pecking order. Pathetic.
Anonymous wrote:Wellesley clearly has the superior quality students these days. These two used to be comparable but Bryn Mawr has slipped behind. No fault to Bryn Mawr, but just that the demand for all women's colleges is very small and the cream of the crop flock to Wellesley.
Academics at both are excellent. I'd venture to say that Bryn Mawr offers a great opportunity for a good student who wouldn't make the cut at Haverford or Swarthmore but to get access to the same quality education.