Anonymous wrote:This is another reason why we need the “adversity score” on the SAT.
Anonymous wrote:This is another reason why we need the “adversity score” on the SAT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is very hard on all the students in such schools when so many kids get extra time on tests. Hard to figure out what is fair.
Can you imagine being a student in one of those schools where 1 in 3 gets extra time? How can one get good grades?
My daughter was one. In a college-prep private school. 23% of the kids has accommodations and extra time. It made it really hard. The kids took advantage of it all the time. They couldn't lose points for any late work. Tests would take forever to return to all because kids would wait a week or so more to study and take it.
It is also a huge asset for the ACT more than the SAT, which is easier, but fast paced. One of her friends bragged about going from a 29, getting a ADD diagnosis and retaking it senior year for a 34. F'ing ridiculous. The docs are paid off, especially the ones that take cash instead of insurance.
Anonymous wrote:No one should get extra time. It is just a scam for the wealthy to push their kids above the others.
In real life you don't get extra time.
Anonymous wrote:I think conflating 504 percentages with SAT accommodations isn't correct. More kids should get 504s - 1.6 % is too low.
Agree that SAT should either become untimed, or much much much more selective in how it grants additional time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is very hard on all the students in such schools when so many kids get extra time on tests. Hard to figure out what is fair.
Can you imagine being a student in one of those schools where 1 in 3 gets extra time? How can one get good grades?
Anonymous wrote:It is very hard on all the students in such schools when so many kids get extra time on tests. Hard to figure out what is fair.