Anonymous wrote:Archie isnt short for anything? Sigh.
Anonymous wrote:Archie isnt short for anything? Sigh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For effs sake. It was so nice having the first page of the forum be royal obsession free for once.
PS- that’s not new information. Kate also had princess listed. What else do you think they would put as occupation? Free loader? Banana writer? Humanitarian?
That's Princess Meghan to you commoner.
Anonymous wrote:For effs sake. It was so nice having the first page of the forum be royal obsession free for once.
PS- that’s not new information. Kate also had princess listed. What else do you think they would put as occupation? Free loader? Banana writer? Humanitarian?


Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cool. I was just wondering why his "His Royal Highness" comes before his name, and hers came after? Is that significant of something?
I think it is who is born royal v. who isn't?
It looks incorrect to me but obviously Harry knows better than me: I think it should be HRH Prince Henry etc.

Anonymous wrote:Cool. I was just wondering why his "His Royal Highness" comes before his name, and hers came after? Is that significant of something?
Anonymous wrote:What’s interesting is that they published it after saying they wouldn’t.