Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've been to meetings about this. The math office isn't happy but for next year, they have no choice but do the C 2.0 4/5 and 5/6 math courses. Eureka doesn't have the time to compile a condensed curriculum for both of those courses prior to the start of the school year. Another issue that they run into is that once the current third grade students are in 5/6, MCPS will be teaching two different curriculums - 5th grade Eureka Math and 6th Grade Illustrative math. It's far from ideal for teachers to spend half the year in one curriculum, then try and learn and teach a completely different curriculum the last half of the year.
The math office is well aware that there needs to be a solution and is working on it. Everyone is in agreement that the interim solution of teaching C 2.0 isn't ideal but on the flip side you would have parents flipping out that their child didn't have access to any advanced math at all.
So is the idea that they will transition to a consolidated Eureka curriculum? Did they provide details about the timeline for this?
Anonymous wrote:I've been to meetings about this. The math office isn't happy but for next year, they have no choice but do the C 2.0 4/5 and 5/6 math courses. Eureka doesn't have the time to compile a condensed curriculum for both of those courses prior to the start of the school year. Another issue that they run into is that once the current third grade students are in 5/6, MCPS will be teaching two different curriculums - 5th grade Eureka Math and 6th Grade Illustrative math. It's far from ideal for teachers to spend half the year in one curriculum, then try and learn and teach a completely different curriculum the last half of the year.
The math office is well aware that there needs to be a solution and is working on it. Everyone is in agreement that the interim solution of teaching C 2.0 isn't ideal but on the flip side you would have parents flipping out that their child didn't have access to any advanced math at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe each school is different. I'd ask your principal. Quick and easy email.
They shouldn't be different. Curriculum should be standard across the district. It's upsetting that MCPS would spend all this time picking a new math curriculum, only to use the crappy old one for the high-performing kids.

Anonymous wrote:Maybe each school is different. I'd ask your principal. Quick and easy email.
Anonymous wrote:This was rolled out at our ES for 3rd grade and it looks like a solid curriculum. Is that what they use for 4/5 & 5/6 as well?