While its true that peripheral suburb to suburb commutes will not end as long as we have so much decentralized employment, I believe many people commuting from from Maryland to Virginia do so because housing is cheaper in Maryland, in part because of restrictions on development close to some major employment centers in Virginia. That is being addressed in some ways, but more can be done.
And I did not say that alone would solve the problem, but I think it should be addressed.
Not sure everyone in western FFX would agree. More importantly, I am skeptical the Fairfax Board of Supervisors which has placed a huge bet on the success of Tysons, would agree.
I live in an inner jurisdiction in NoVa, and used to live in Fairfax. I am quite familiar with conditions in the suburbs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Loudoun county has supported a bridge crossing for years. It's Montgomery County and Maryland that opposes it.
Point of rocks bridge (15) also needs replaced badly.
Loudoun may support it (not sure everyone in the neighborhood where the connection from the bridge to Rte 28 would be cut through agrees) I don't think Fairfax which is better off with added capacity at the ALB is on board though. As noted VDOT says the latter is a better choice. I am quite sure Arlington and Alexandria are not enthusiastic about an outer crossing.
We should also look at housing policies that would enable more people to live closer to their work. [/quote]
We need another bridge--and I think people in western Fairfax would agree.
Housing policies are not going to fix this.
1. Most married couples have two spouses working. One may work in Virginia and the other in MD.
2. In the DMV people do not necessarily stay with the same company for years. Government contractors may be based in Virginia--but work on a contract in MD for a year or two, and then back again.
3. Much of the traffic across the bridges is not necessarily local. People/tourists/truckers driving through.
None of this will be solved by housing. Ask your neighbors where they work.
Maybe PP lives and works in the District. Things are different in MD and VA.
While its true that peripheral suburb to suburb commutes will not end as long as we have so much decentralized employment, I believe many people commuting from from Maryland to Virginia do so because housing is cheaper in Maryland, in part because of restrictions on development close to some major employment centers in Virginia. That is being addressed in some ways, but more can be done.
And I did not say that alone would solve the problem, but I think it should be addressed.
Not sure everyone in western FFX would agree. More importantly, I am skeptical the Fairfax Board of Supervisors which has placed a huge bet on the success of Tysons, would agree.
I live in an inner jurisdiction in NoVa, and used to live in Fairfax. I am quite familiar with conditions in the suburbs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Loudoun county has supported a bridge crossing for years. It's Montgomery County and Maryland that opposes it.
Point of rocks bridge (15) also needs replaced badly.
Loudoun may support it (not sure everyone in the neighborhood where the connection from the bridge to Rte 28 would be cut through agrees) I don't think Fairfax which is better off with added capacity at the ALB is on board though. As noted VDOT says the latter is a better choice. I am quite sure Arlington and Alexandria are not enthusiastic about an outer crossing.
We should also look at housing policies that would enable more people to live closer to their work. [/quote]
We need another bridge--and I think people in western Fairfax would agree.
Housing policies are not going to fix this.
1. Most married couples have two spouses working. One may work in Virginia and the other in MD.
2. In the DMV people do not necessarily stay with the same company for years. Government contractors may be based in Virginia--but work on a contract in MD for a year or two, and then back again.
3. Much of the traffic across the bridges is not necessarily local. People/tourists/truckers driving through.
None of this will be solved by housing. Ask your neighbors where they work.
Maybe PP lives and works in the District. Things are different in MD and VA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Loudoun county has supported a bridge crossing for years. It's Montgomery County and Maryland that opposes it.
Point of rocks bridge (15) also needs replaced badly.
Loudoun may support it (not sure everyone in the neighborhood where the connection from the bridge to Rte 28 would be cut through agrees) I don't think Fairfax which is better off with added capacity at the ALB is on board though. As noted VDOT says the latter is a better choice. I am quite sure Arlington and Alexandria are not enthusiastic about an outer crossing.
We should also look at housing policies that would enable more people to live closer to their work.
Anonymous wrote:Loudoun county has supported a bridge crossing for years. It's Montgomery County and Maryland that opposes it.
Point of rocks bridge (15) also needs replaced badly.
Anonymous wrote:Further proof another Potomac crossing is not only needed but is vital yet isn’t even being considered
Anonymous wrote:Never going to happen in the agricultural preserve of MoCo, which is the only option, pretty much.
Forget it.
A better option would be another identical crossing right next to the current one, use both, that way, if anything happened on one span all the traffic could use the other. A crash won't shut down both spans.