Anonymous wrote:No they’re not.
My workplace is filled with people who went to all sorts of colleges. Everywhere from Harvard and Yale to Baylor to Albion College. We all got to the same place, doing the same job.
I’m not saying going to a community college is the same as going to MIT, but freaking out if you don’t get into an Ivy League school is absolutely asinine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like maybe they are for low income and maybe middle class people but what about everyone else?
Studies show the best indicator of a child’s future socioeconomic status is their parents own economic class.
So why are all these rich people risking jail time and public humiliation and shaming for something that won’t even help their kids that much?
And beyond those people, why are “regular” UMC types who can’t afford to bribe or donate their way in putting so much pressure on their kids to jump through the hoops and get the best grades, test scores, extracurriculars, etc. for a less than 10% chance of getting in and making it feel “worth it”?
In this new Gilded Age of ever-rising income inequality, people feel desperate to do everything they can to give their kids access to upper middle class opportunities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like maybe they are for low income and maybe middle class people but what about everyone else?
Studies show the best indicator of a child’s future socioeconomic status is their parents own economic class.
So why are all these rich people risking jail time and public humiliation and shaming for something that won’t even help their kids that much?
And beyond those people, why are “regular” UMC types who can’t afford to bribe or donate their way in putting so much pressure on their kids to jump through the hoops and get the best grades, test scores, extracurriculars, etc. for a less than 10% chance of getting in and making it feel “worth it”?
Are graduate school admissions better from the prestigious schools?
Yes and no.
My DC is very focused on grad school and searched for schools that had the best record of students going on to MA and PhD programs overall and in their expected major (which may change).
The elite colleges do a good job getting students into strong grad schools, but there are some lesser elite privates that do as well (Wooster, Juniata, Beloit, Kalamazoo, for example) and many offer good merit aid to strong students, bringing the cost pretty close to in-state tuition at a state flagship.
Anonymous wrote:I feel like maybe they are for low income and maybe middle class people but what about everyone else?
Studies show the best indicator of a child’s future socioeconomic status is their parents own economic class.
So why are all these rich people risking jail time and public humiliation and shaming for something that won’t even help their kids that much?
And beyond those people, why are “regular” UMC types who can’t afford to bribe or donate their way in putting so much pressure on their kids to jump through the hoops and get the best grades, test scores, extracurriculars, etc. for a less than 10% chance of getting in and making it feel “worth it”?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like maybe they are for low income and maybe middle class people but what about everyone else?
Studies show the best indicator of a child’s future socioeconomic status is their parents own economic class.
So why are all these rich people risking jail time and public humiliation and shaming for something that won’t even help their kids that much?
And beyond those people, why are “regular” UMC types who can’t afford to bribe or donate their way in putting so much pressure on their kids to jump through the hoops and get the best grades, test scores, extracurriculars, etc. for a less than 10% chance of getting in and making it feel “worth it”?
Are graduate school admissions better from the prestigious schools?
Anonymous wrote:I feel like maybe they are for low income and maybe middle class people but what about everyone else?
Studies show the best indicator of a child’s future socioeconomic status is their parents own economic class.
So why are all these rich people risking jail time and public humiliation and shaming for something that won’t even help their kids that much?
And beyond those people, why are “regular” UMC types who can’t afford to bribe or donate their way in putting so much pressure on their kids to jump through the hoops and get the best grades, test scores, extracurriculars, etc. for a less than 10% chance of getting in and making it feel “worth it”?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like maybe they are for low income and maybe middle class people but what about everyone else?
Studies show the best indicator of a child’s future socioeconomic status is their parents own economic class.
So why are all these rich people risking jail time and public humiliation and shaming for something that won’t even help their kids that much?
And beyond those people, why are “regular” UMC types who can’t afford to bribe or donate their way in putting so much pressure on their kids to jump through the hoops and get the best grades, test scores, extracurriculars, etc. for a less than 10% chance of getting in and making it feel “worth it”?
Because the parents need to be able to brag about where their kids go to college. They will feel ashamed to tell their Big Law/CEO/Hollywood friends that their kids are going to a school that it not perceived as one of the best. It's 100% parent ego.
Anonymous wrote:I feel like maybe they are for low income and maybe middle class people but what about everyone else?
Studies show the best indicator of a child’s future socioeconomic status is their parents own economic class.
So why are all these rich people risking jail time and public humiliation and shaming for something that won’t even help their kids that much?
And beyond those people, why are “regular” UMC types who can’t afford to bribe or donate their way in putting so much pressure on their kids to jump through the hoops and get the best grades, test scores, extracurriculars, etc. for a less than 10% chance of getting in and making it feel “worth it”?
Anonymous wrote:Because people need status and things that signal that status. As well as a common denominator to make friends, meet spouses and signal to employers that they are of the right "type" for whatever profession.
Yes truly smart, intelligent people will probably make it anywhere. As will lucky and personable people. But it's much much easier to get that first break after going to a top-whatvwr school and have the hiring manager/etc say "hey we have a lot of kids dorm that school here and they have done well".
Anonymous wrote:I feel like maybe they are for low income and maybe middle class people but what about everyone else?
Studies show the best indicator of a child’s future socioeconomic status is their parents own economic class.
So why are all these rich people risking jail time and public humiliation and shaming for something that won’t even help their kids that much?
And beyond those people, why are “regular” UMC types who can’t afford to bribe or donate their way in putting so much pressure on their kids to jump through the hoops and get the best grades, test scores, extracurriculars, etc. for a less than 10% chance of getting in and making it feel “worth it”?