Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Club DA is toast. MLS recognized the talent dilution. They were glorified A teams.
Why would MLS care about talent dilution on their farm team? They do not care about wins and loses on their developmental squad.
Anonymous wrote:Club DA is toast. MLS recognized the talent dilution. They were glorified A teams.
Anonymous wrote:From what I have gathered, the MLS clubs are tiring of the lack of competitive matches in the DA are the ones pushing for more open dates in the DA calendar so they can take on international opponents, many of whom do 'tours' of the USA looking for squads to play. As businesses, they also shudder at the thought of spending all this time and money on a kid only for them to walk away on a 'free' to college or another professional team one day.
Some of the smaller DA programs are under pressure for 'more games, more tournaments' from their parents who are saying 'I pay this much for XX games and I can pay the same for XX+10 games with this club'. More than a few parents have bristled at the cost of showcase matches that are airplane rides and hotels away, not to mention multiple days off school when there are clubs nearby that they could play easier / cheaper.
And then of course there is the whole issue of control. MLS doesn't want to follow the dictates of US soccer when it comes to developing their own talent.
I really don't see how a split can be avoided.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coaches within the DA system say that is far from decided.
The bolded is telling.
There’s a vested interest for them. They are looking for a job if it’s over.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.ussoccerda.com/20190307-NEWS-DA-Four-New-Clubs-to-Join-Boys-DA-for-201920-Season
New DA clubs announced but none in the DMV.
This explains why Loudoun moved its boys teams to ECNL. It is also interesting that Arlington did not get additional age groups.
No it’s not. If you follow soccer, even MLS wants to be rid of academies.
DA is a dying breed.
Anonymous wrote:Coaches within the DA system say that is far from decided.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.ussoccerda.com/20190307-NEWS-DA-Four-New-Clubs-to-Join-Boys-DA-for-201920-Season
New DA clubs announced but none in the DMV.
This explains why Loudoun moved its boys teams to ECNL. It is also interesting that Arlington did not get additional age groups.
No it’s not. If you follow soccer, even MLS wants to be rid of academies.
DA is a dying breed.
MLS does not want to give up control over DA, they may restructure it, but they hate giving up power.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.ussoccerda.com/20190307-NEWS-DA-Four-New-Clubs-to-Join-Boys-DA-for-201920-Season
New DA clubs announced but none in the DMV.
This explains why Loudoun moved its boys teams to ECNL. It is also interesting that Arlington did not get additional age groups.
No it’s not. If you follow soccer, even MLS wants to be rid of academies.
DA is a dying breed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.ussoccerda.com/20190307-NEWS-DA-Four-New-Clubs-to-Join-Boys-DA-for-201920-Season
New DA clubs announced but none in the DMV.
This explains why Loudoun moved its boys teams to ECNL. It is also interesting that Arlington did not get additional age groups.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.ussoccerda.com/20190307-NEWS-DA-Four-New-Clubs-to-Join-Boys-DA-for-201920-Season
New DA clubs announced but none in the DMV.