Problem is MEN.

Any race and political party, they are animals. Including the pussy grabber.

Anonymous wrote:A remodeling company employs him? So, this man could be in my house near my young children working? Sounds great.

Do you leave your young children unattended while people do work in your house? I sure don't.

Why wouldn’t he be deported instead of ‘facing 65 years in prison?’

A remodeling company employs him? So, this man could be in my house near my young children working? Sounds great.

Anonymous wrote:He was released two weeks ago. Why is the news just picking it up now?

Anyway, the incidents allegedly occurred back in 2013. Bail may be really low because there isn’t much evidence. And he no longer has contact with the victim. He also has no prior record.

More information:
https://komonews.com/news/nation-world/judge-releases-accused-child-molester-on-0-bond-victim-only-eight-years-old-at-time

"Montgomery County District Court Judge John Moffett released Sagastume-Gonzalez on an unsecured personal bond, meaning the accused child molester did not have to put down any money before walking out of jail. Someone did, however, have to sign a document promising to pay $10,000 should Sagastume-Gonzalez go on the run. Sagastume-Gonzalez was also ordered to turn in all travel documents and refrain from spending time with children unless supervised by another adult.
According to court documents, Sagastume-Gonzalez was born in Guatemala, but has lived in the U.S. for at least six years. He currently resides with his wife and child"

The 6 years are the period since the alleged abuse? The US doesn't know how long he's been in this country? Are travel documents relevant and what are they? Ankle bracelet? https://doee.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/ddoe/publication/attachments/DC%20Certified%20Lead%20Abatement%20Workers%20Updated%202-23-18.pdf Same individual?

You can only search cases by name and case number. Unless you know those you can’t search for them. The county decides when you find out the name of the accused

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was released two weeks ago. Why is the news just picking it up now?

Anyway, the incidents allegedly occurred back in 2013. Bail may be really low because there isn’t much evidence. And he no longer has contact with the victim. He also has no prior record.

it took years for people to find out about the ms13 child prostitution ring in Montgomery county, story which broke only a couple months ago only when one customer pled guilty . The county suppresses these stories for as long as they can

It’s public information on case search. Reporters sit in the court house all day. Nobody is suppressing anything.

how do you search their name if you don’t know their name?

welcome to the new Montgomery county

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He was released two weeks ago. Why is the news just picking it up now?

Anyway, the incidents allegedly occurred back in 2013. Bail may be really low because there isn’t much evidence. And he no longer has contact with the victim. He also has no prior record.

it took years for people to find out about the ms13 child prostitution ring in Montgomery county, story which broke only a couple months ago only when one customer pled guilty . The county suppresses these stories for as long as they can

It’s public information on case search. Reporters sit in the court house all day. Nobody is suppressing anything.

Anonymous wrote:He was released two weeks ago. Why is the news just picking it up now?

Anyway, the incidents allegedly occurred back in 2013. Bail may be really low because there isn’t much evidence. And he no longer has contact with the victim. He also has no prior record.

it took years for people to find out about the ms13 child prostitution ring in Montgomery county, story which broke only a couple months ago only when one customer pled guilty . The county suppresses these stories for as long as they can

Anonymous wrote:Liberal judges constantly let people accused of attempted murder out as well. They are pro criminal

Nope. Pro Constitution. Innocent until proven guilty. And the pretrial supervision system here is better than most in the nation.

He was released two weeks ago. Why is the news just picking it up now?

Anyway, the incidents allegedly occurred back in 2013. Bail may be really low because there isn’t much evidence. And he no longer has contact with the victim. He also has no prior record.

Liberal judges constantly let people accused of attempted murder out as well. They are pro criminal

I really don't understand why or how a judge comes to this decision. I wish we could get more context on how this happens. Is there some sort of rule that forces the judge to do this? If so, we need it to change.

No Democrats I know in MoCo want abusers like this man on the streets.

https://twitter.com/abc7kevin/status/1101131296015818752?s=21

Wow. That’s pathetic . How pro criminal can you get?