For $6000 per semester, it’s beautiful. We love!

You learn inside. How it looks outside matters 0.

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of $EC schools that are just as, um, plain.

This is a stupid comment and not remotely true

Texas A&M is worse...far worse...and then, you're there...in Aggieland...

Sorry. It is hideous.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of $EC schools that are just as, um, plain.

Name one. Every SEC school I’ve been to has been beautiful.

#1 Mason and UMBC are really good schools and great value, my nephew is at Mason. But come on, If you are just looking at beauty of campus they don’t come close to SEC schools——have you been so Georgia, Tennessee, Auburn....

Check out American & GW. Or JMU. Or 100s of other schools. If you pay $70k a year, you’ll probably get a pretty campus. Otherwise, quit your complaining.

Koch Brothers should spend their money beautifying

Not sure why this surprises you. And it’s not really industrial, just NoVa suburbs.

But there’s a lot of new dev on campus. So really nice spaces being built.

Serious question: were you expecting it to be beautiful? I mean, this is a college in Suburban Sprawl, VA. It's not exactly a part of the state/country known for its aesthetics.

Anonymous wrote:There are a lot of $EC schools that are just as, um, plain.

Name one. Every SEC school I’ve been to has been beautiful.

Commuter college.

UMBC is pretty terrible.

There are a lot of $EC schools that are just as, um, plain.

Wow. Toured and was surprised by the industrial area around the campus. Do you think that impacts applications? My DS was totally turned off.