Anonymous wrote:There is an IQ scale for gifted and genius, idiots
Anonymous wrote:
As a trained statistician, it's too high. On the other hand, this area has a strong selection bias towards the very bright.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my school, only the top 2% had gifted services/identification and there was a school wide cap of 12 or 14. I was tested at about 135 and didn't make it. The kids I knew who were in had 140+.
I was surprised that a simple ipad game was used for identification in APS and now I see what that gets us.
As a trained statistician, it's too high. On the other hand, this area has a strong selection bias towards the very bright.
What iPad game?
Anonymous wrote:In my school, only the top 2% had gifted services/identification and there was a school wide cap of 12 or 14. I was tested at about 135 and didn't make it. The kids I knew who were in had 140+.
I was surprised that a simple ipad game was used for identification in APS and now I see what that gets us.
As a trained statistician, it's too high. On the other hand, this area has a strong selection bias towards the very bright.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I was in a gifted program in grade school and took all honors/all AP classes in high school. I consider all of those classmates gifted. Why shouldn't they be?
I would consider the overwhelming majority of those kids bright, but not gifted. Gifted is generally defined as top 2%. Most kids in all honors/AP classes are not in the top 2%. In Fairfax and Arlington, it seems like every above average child is considered gifted these days.![]()
This was years ago. The district used IQ tests. So you apparently don't believe that gifted has anything to do with IQ. I'm not sure why not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I was in a gifted program in grade school and took all honors/all AP classes in high school. I consider all of those classmates gifted. Why shouldn't they be?
I would consider the overwhelming majority of those kids bright, but not gifted. Gifted is generally defined as top 2%. Most kids in all honors/AP classes are not in the top 2%. In Fairfax and Arlington, it seems like every above average child is considered gifted these days.![]()
This was years ago. The district used IQ tests. So you apparently don't believe that gifted has anything to do with IQ. I'm not sure why not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I was in a gifted program in grade school and took all honors/all AP classes in high school. I consider all of those classmates gifted. Why shouldn't they be?
I would consider the overwhelming majority of those kids bright, but not gifted. Gifted is generally defined as top 2%. Most kids in all honors/AP classes are not in the top 2%. In Fairfax and Arlington, it seems like every above average child is considered gifted these days.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I was in a gifted program in grade school and took all honors/all AP classes in high school. I consider all of those classmates gifted. Why shouldn't they be?
I would consider the overwhelming majority of those kids bright, but not gifted. Gifted is generally defined as top 2%. Most kids in all honors/AP classes are not in the top 2%. In Fairfax and Arlington, it seems like every above average child is considered gifted these days.![]()
Anonymous wrote:
I was in a gifted program in grade school and took all honors/all AP classes in high school. I consider all of those classmates gifted. Why shouldn't they be?
Anonymous wrote:I think the screening tests are bogus. My kids both scored very high and were automatically flagged for gifted services. They are certainly bright, but not "gifted". I never would have referred them.
I have only known a dozen or so "gifted" people in my life (1 in APS right now), even as a bright student myself (top 10 undergrad/grad).