Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not trying to become more wealthy.. I'm DC poor but on the higher end of middle class nationwide
I want the money to go to the people that are struggling more than I am
In terms of things that could benefit me, maybe some programs to help my kids in the future, like Pre-K, making college more affordable, etc
higher end of middle class is around $100k. Is that you? If so, I'd be all for helping your kids pay for college IF they are by students. If they are C or below students, let's help them prepare for life with a vocational training program.
And as far as pre-K, you're just looking for someone else to pay day care costs. You had 'em.....you take care of it.
Anonymous wrote:I'm not trying to become more wealthy.. I'm DC poor but on the higher end of middle class nationwide
I want the money to go to the people that are struggling more than I am
In terms of things that could benefit me, maybe some programs to help my kids in the future, like Pre-K, making college more affordable, etc
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tell us how taking more money from people who are wealthy will make you more wealthy.
How will taxing the wealthy solve the problem of income inequality.
The money could be used in a million ways to make people less poor or give middle class people more opportunities.
Have you ever heard of something called a government?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is that for the added revenue from taxing the rich to make a dent, DCUM would have to agree that the rich includes anyone worth $3 million or earning $300k+. Watch the DCUM liberals squawk about that.
But I'd be for it.
Tax away. HHI $500-700k.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is that for the added revenue from taxing the rich to make a dent, DCUM would have to agree that the rich includes anyone worth $3 million or earning $300k+. Watch the DCUM liberals squawk about that.
But I'd be for it.
Not true at all. A significant amount of money could be raised even if we only tax wealth above $50 million
Anonymous wrote:The problem is that for the added revenue from taxing the rich to make a dent, DCUM would have to agree that the rich includes anyone worth $3 million or earning $300k+. Watch the DCUM liberals squawk about that.
But I'd be for it.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is that for the added revenue from taxing the rich to make a dent, DCUM would have to agree that the rich includes anyone worth $3 million or earning $300k+. Watch the DCUM liberals squawk about that.
But I'd be for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Tell us how taking more money from people who are wealthy will make you more wealthy.
How will taxing the wealthy solve the problem of income inequality.
The money could be used in a million ways to make people less poor or give middle class people more opportunities.
Have you ever heard of something called a government?
Anonymous wrote:Tell us how taking more money from people who are wealthy will make you more wealthy.
How will taxing the wealthy solve the problem of income inequality.