Anonymous wrote:Is the kid screaming? No? Then there's no problem.
Anonymous wrote:???Anonymous wrote:"Andrew, I'd like you to take over feeding Aidan, since you know best how he should be fed. It's obvious that you would do a much better job."
My DH is similar, and this is the response I use.
And no, it’s not necessary to follow your kid around to feed them unless directed by a doctor or other health professional. I don’t really understand this culture of constantly following kids around and forcing food on them, but I suppose that’s a complaint for the General Parenting forum.....
Anonymous wrote:Does no one use a high chair anymore?
???Anonymous wrote:"Andrew, I'd like you to take over feeding Aidan, since you know best how he should be fed. It's obvious that you would do a much better job."
Anonymous wrote:Your kid doesn't eat at the table? I think it's perfectly normal to serve dinner for everyone, sit the 3 year old at the table and if he's not hungry he can go. We have a rule that our dd (also 3) needs to sit for about 10 min with us as we eat and if she's really not hungry she can go. There's at least one thing on her plate she will always eat and she's allowed a small toy to keep her attention st the table so she actually eats eventually.
I don't think it's great you're not following your 3 year old with food. That sets a bad precedent. Your husband is odd and his commentary is not productive. He could offer your da to sit in his lap as an incentive to hang out with parents during dinner time.
Anonymous wrote:"Andrew, I'd like you to take over feeding Aidan, since you know best how he should be fed. It's obvious that you would do a much better job."