Anonymous wrote:I imagine you've had all the testing done to determine the cause for recurrent pregnancy loss (i.e., genetic testing, immune testing, etc.)? No cause found/nothing came from this testing?
I think the problem you are having is that many insurance companies do not necessarily view IVF as treatment for RPL because there is no issue apparent issue getting pregnant, it's just staying pregnant that is the problem and if the reason for that is not known, IVF is not necessarily going to prevent it.
I agree with this post. I can see how IVF is not medically necessary for RPL as in your case you are able to get pregnant without ART. IVF is considered when you have not been able to conceive naturally on your own hence why it is covered in that instance. The problem like PP said is to find out the reason for the pregnancy loss (genetic, immune issues, lining problems) as IVF does not necessarily prevent pregnancy loss it just helps one to conceive.