If the baby arrives around mid to late Feb, then she was pregnant at her wedding.

She's not having twins. She's just due sooner than they want you to believe.

She's a skinny weight-obsessed/looks obsessed health nut, so it's not like she's packing on unnecessary weight with junk food. My sister is due this spring and she's not even wearing maternity clothes yet. Her belly no longer looks flat, but she certainly doesn't look like she has a ball under her dress like MM.

Boy girl twins would be so cute!

That dress looks like something you’d wear in the summer not winter.

I am 'nearing my third trimester' and due in late March. I am WAY bigger than her. That said, this is #2 for me. I think she looks normal.

No, she doesn’t look big AT ALL. She’s growing a human, let her live!

She has a tiny frame and that is a form fitting dress which really emphasizes her bump. If she was wearing a looser dress you might barely notice her pregnancy.

I think she looks around 5 months. I think that she will get "huge" come early March and I think the baby will be born early April.

Anonymous wrote:Does she look big given the estimated birth date or not?

For someone not quite in her third trimester, who is naturally petite? She looks TINY. You are daft.

I don’t think she looks big at all.

Also I've never seen a pregnant celebrity who touches their stomach like that all the time.

She’s naturally tiny so she’s going to look big.

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markle-last-appearance-before-christmas/

Not quite at third trimester.

Or she is due a lot earlier than people think.

"Spring" could be as early as late February, early March.

If she did fertility treatments then it could be twins though.

Pictures people, pictures!!

Eh. I looked HUGE carrying my small DD. Someone grabbed me at Trader Joe's when I was in my second trimester saying I was about to give birth and to go to the hospital immediately. Did a number on my belly skin afterward, I can tell you.

Does she look big given the estimated birth date or not?