Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There was a bipartisan immigration deal that passed the Senate (got more than 60 votes) in 2013 under Obama. Paul Ryan refused to bring it to a vote. Because tea party nutters.
https://www.politifact.com/subjects/immigration/
Then Trump hit the scene. Immigration became the wedge issue and working with Democrats and compromising to actually fix immigration stopped being in Republicans’ best interests. Better to use brown people as the boogeyman. And Dems aren’t that incentives anymore either.
So why isn’t there an agreement? Trump. And Paul Ryan.
There was a border wall money for DACA deal on the table this year. Trump walked away.
In general, there is a plan with bipartisan consensus there. It just isn’t in some Republicans best interests to let it go through.
John Boehner was Speaker of the House that year, not Paul Ryan
Brownstein said, "They found 60 votes in the Senate in 2006 and 2013" for immigration legislation, and "each time the House Republican majority refused to take it up."
Senators did pass immigration bills in 2006 and 2013 with 62 and 68 votes, respectively. Both times, House Republicans did not address the proposals on the House floor.
Anonymous wrote:There was a bipartisan immigration deal that passed the Senate (got more than 60 votes) in 2013 under Obama. Paul Ryan refused to bring it to a vote. Because tea party nutters.
https://www.politifact.com/subjects/immigration/
Then Trump hit the scene. Immigration became the wedge issue and working with Democrats and compromising to actually fix immigration stopped being in Republicans’ best interests. Better to use brown people as the boogeyman. And Dems aren’t that incentives anymore either.
So why isn’t there an agreement? Trump. And Paul Ryan.
There was a border wall money for DACA deal on the table this year. Trump walked away.
In general, there is a plan with bipartisan consensus there. It just isn’t in some Republicans best interests to let it go through.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Plus in 2006 ppl were anti b so No Go
Is this English?
Anonymous wrote:Plus in 2006 ppl were anti b so No Go
Anonymous wrote:I'm a liberal democrat and I can't quite wrap my head around why it is so difficult to find the political will to fix our broken immigration system. Of course, I don't agree with tear gas being used at the borders or children taken from their parents and other reprehensible behavior. The current immigration has lost any sense of basic humanity. However, I see nothing wrong with stringent measures to control illegal immigration. The wall just seems like an impractical and ineffective method but I don't mind additional border patrol. My parents were immigrants from a South Asian country and I have extended family members who literally waited 15 years plus for legal green cards to come here. Do Democrats not see that even the appearance of supporting illegal immigrants is a message that does not resonate with most people? I also wonder why there can't be a special migrant visa created for unskilled workers whose work is desperately needed in certain agricultural industries. Would love any book recommendations on our current immigration system because I'm baffled as to what is causing the impasse.
Anonymous wrote:Don’t feed this distraction thread. Focus today is on trump’s corruption and lies.
Anonymous wrote:There was a bipartisan immigration deal that passed the Senate (got more than 60 votes) in 2013 under Obama. Paul Ryan refused to bring it to a vote. Because tea party nutters.
https://www.politifact.com/subjects/immigration/
Then Trump hit the scene. Immigration became the wedge issue and working with Democrats and compromising to actually fix immigration stopped being in Republicans’ best interests. Better to use brown people as the boogeyman. And Dems aren’t that incentives anymore either.
So why isn’t there an agreement? Trump. And Paul Ryan.
There was a border wall money for DACA deal on the table this year. Trump walked away.
In general, there is a plan with bipartisan consensus there. It just isn’t in some Republicans best interests to let it go through.