^ not

A lot of, if no most, Division 1 athletes, with designs on going pro, don't belong on a university campus.

What is UDC?

Anonymous wrote:The bottom quartile of admitted test scores/grades at elite LACs are comprised mostly of athletes, legacies and URMs.

The top 50% would be Asian if elite US colleges weren't racist.

If they admitted on pure merit, liberal whites who scoff at the lack of merit of legacies and athletes would immediately start whining that "it's not all about merit, HYP doesn't just want boring grade-grubbers, HYP should admit muh well-rounded child!"

UDC is better than most think and can be a good (and cheap) choice.

One's college room-mate can make all the difference. DC got a real dud and is depressed and hating school.

Uva is full of douchebags

Genes, personality and upbringing are a better indicator of success than the University one attends.

Anonymous wrote:The bottom quartile of admitted test scores/grades at elite LACs are comprised mostly of athletes, legacies and URMs.

Agreed. Who else would be down there? VIPs, maybe?

Have a citation?

Anonymous wrote:The bottom quartile of admitted test scores/grades at elite LACs are comprised mostly of athletes, legacies and URMs.

How is that controversial?

50% of all posters on this forum are dopey.

Go back to your homework

Spending $300K on an undergraduate education is utter buffoonery.

The bottom quartile of admitted test scores/grades at elite LACs are comprised mostly of athletes, legacies and URMs.