Anonymous wrote:What are you looking for in a tour? You definitely won't be able to sit in on classes so really the only thing you can see is the building itself. You also won't be able to talk to the teachers or students. Public schools don't care one way or the other if you come there. Private schools care so that is why they hold open houses. My son went to a magnet elementary school and they did have an open house in November prior to the application deadline. The assistant principal gave a short talk in the cafeteria and they have 5th grade students giving brief tours. That was one day and they had a limit on the number of people attending (you had to RSVP by a certain date and they only had space for a certain number of people).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't have a huge problem with this. You touring is disruptive to the students and their day. Privates do it because they are selling themselves to parents but publics aren't in that position.
And who on staff is supposed to take time off to give tours? There is no admissions staff. Should tax dollars go to paying someone's salary so they can give tours to parents? I doubt anyone is thrilled with that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't have a huge problem with this. You touring is disruptive to the students and their day. Privates do it because they are selling themselves to parents but publics aren't in that position.
This is OP, and I agree that they don't really have the staff available to give me a tour. I have always been surprised when people suggest that. What I object to are the DCUM posters who insist that "instead of relying on Great Schools ratings, you really need to go take a tour of the schools and see for yourself" when that isn't an option!
Which is why Great Schoools Scores matter.
They matter people.
We all know it
And your house values depend on it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't have a huge problem with this. You touring is disruptive to the students and their day. Privates do it because they are selling themselves to parents but publics aren't in that position.
This is OP, and I agree that they don't really have the staff available to give me a tour. I have always been surprised when people suggest that. What I object to are the DCUM posters who insist that "instead of relying on Great Schools ratings, you really need to go take a tour of the schools and see for yourself" when that isn't an option!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't have a huge problem with this. You touring is disruptive to the students and their day. Privates do it because they are selling themselves to parents but publics aren't in that position.
This is OP, and I agree that they don't really have the staff available to give me a tour. I have always been surprised when people suggest that. What I object to are the DCUM posters who insist that "instead of relying on Great Schools ratings, you really need to go take a tour of the schools and see for yourself" when that isn't an option!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't have a huge problem with this. You touring is disruptive to the students and their day. Privates do it because they are selling themselves to parents but publics aren't in that position.
This is OP, and I agree that they don't really have the staff available to give me a tour. I have always been surprised when people suggest that. What I object to are the DCUM posters who insist that "instead of relying on Great Schools ratings, you really need to go take a tour of the schools and see for yourself" when that isn't an option!
Anonymous wrote:I don't have a huge problem with this. You touring is disruptive to the students and their day. Privates do it because they are selling themselves to parents but publics aren't in that position.
Anonymous wrote:I don't have a huge problem with this. You touring is disruptive to the students and their day. Privates do it because they are selling themselves to parents but publics aren't in that position.