Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice the part about re-boundarying earlier than planned?
I thought it was scheduled for 2020 but this report says 2022-23?
No, it was scheduled for 2022-23.
Can't happen soon enough IMO but will be satisfied if it really starts in 2022.
Out of curiosity, what are you hoping for and what are your suggestions for the review?
Not PP, but I suspect the idea here is to provide some relief from overcrowing in upper NW. Not sure they will want to take their medicine though.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice the part about re-boundarying earlier than planned?
I thought it was scheduled for 2020 but this report says 2022-23?
No, it was scheduled for 2022-23.
Can't happen soon enough IMO but will be satisfied if it really starts in 2022.
Out of curiosity, what are you hoping for and what are your suggestions for the review?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice the part about re-boundarying earlier than planned?
I thought it was scheduled for 2020 but this report says 2022-23?
No, it was scheduled for 2022-23.
Can't happen soon enough IMO but will be satisfied if it really starts in 2022.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice the part about re-boundarying earlier than planned?
I thought it was scheduled for 2020 but this report says 2022-23?
No, it was scheduled for 2022-23.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice the part about re-boundarying earlier than planned?
I thought it was scheduled for 2020 but this report says 2022-23?
Anonymous wrote:Has the legally required public meeting about this plan already happened? They are supposed to have at least 1.
Anonymous wrote:Here's the link to all the materials
https://dme.dc.gov/MFP2018
Shockingly there is a mismatch between DC's LEAs (DCPS + charters) plans -- building for 122K students when projected growth is 110K.
Anonymous wrote:Did anyone notice the part about re-boundarying earlier than planned?