Anonymous wrote:The report seems to conclude that the DCC has not achieved its aims but then doesn’t suggest getting rid of it.
Key Finding 6: The MSMC has been more successful than the high school consortia (the
DCC and the NEC) in promoting racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic diversity due in large
part to shifting demographics as well as three programmatic elements: the MSMC, unlike
the DCC and the NEC, does not utilize base areas, admits out-of-boundary students, and
has developed and implemented distinct, whole-school themes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/info/choice/ChoiceStudyReport-Version2-20160307.pdf
The report recommends that they use non cognitive criteria and compare minorities to others with their background when determining who gets into programs like the magnets
Non-cognitive criteria means what exactly, their height or weight? This seems a little absurd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/info/choice/ChoiceStudyReport-Version2-20160307.pdf
The report recommends that they use non cognitive criteria and compare minorities to others with their background when determining who gets into programs like the magnets
Anonymous wrote:https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/info/choice/ChoiceStudyReport-Version2-20160307.pdf
Anonymous wrote:The odds are great that people will snicker to your face and 10x as much behind your back when you mention where you live.
Anonymous wrote:The odds are great that people will snicker to your face and 10x as much behind your back when you mention where you live.
Anonymous wrote:https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/uploadedFiles/info/choice/ChoiceStudyReport-Version2-20160307.pdf