Anonymous wrote:DS received a letter from the school that EA at BC is more selective than RD. He wanted to apply to EA and get the process over with sooner. But now he is not sure it's worth it.
Any other schools are like that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Basically if you were to be denied in EA, you would also be denied if you waited to apply RD. There would be no difference in outcome for people who are denied in EA vs. RD. Bottom line, if your application is ready and your test scores optimal at EA deadline, you should go for it if you want to know the outcome sooner.
This is what BC told him "At Boston College, the Early Action review process is more selective than our Regular Decision process." That seems to imply that you would have a better chance in RD vs EA.
Anonymous wrote:Basically if you were to be denied in EA, you would also be denied if you waited to apply RD. There would be no difference in outcome for people who are denied in EA vs. RD. Bottom line, if your application is ready and your test scores optimal at EA deadline, you should go for it if you want to know the outcome sooner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:EA increases the odds of merit money.
Other than 15 presidential scholars with full scholarships, there is no merit money at BC.
Anonymous wrote:Basically if you were to be denied in EA, you would also be denied if you waited to apply RD. There would be no difference in outcome for people who are denied in EA vs. RD. Bottom line, if your application is ready and your test scores optimal at EA deadline, you should go for it if you want to know the outcome sooner.
Anonymous wrote:EA increases the odds of merit money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DS received a letter from the school that EA at BC is more selective than RD. He wanted to apply to EA and get the process over with sooner. But now he is not sure it's worth it.
Any other schools are like that?
That's what EA is all about. It's not binding so it's more selective Notre Dame is the same way. UVA advises that you not apply EA unless you're supremely qualified as well. ED is less selective. EA is more selective.
Are you new to college admissions or something?
I am new to this process. Are you implying for all schools EA will always be more selective than RD? That doesn't seem to make sense.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DS received a letter from the school that EA at BC is more selective than RD. He wanted to apply to EA and get the process over with sooner. But now he is not sure it's worth it.
Any other schools are like that?
That's what EA is all about. It's not binding so it's more selective Notre Dame is the same way. UVA advises that you not apply EA unless you're supremely qualified as well. ED is less selective. EA is more selective.
Are you new to college admissions or something?
Anonymous wrote:DS received a letter from the school that EA at BC is more selective than RD. He wanted to apply to EA and get the process over with sooner. But now he is not sure it's worth it.
Any other schools are like that?