Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Had she transitioned hormonally?
In sport, I do think it provides a significant advantage for someone who is still physiologically a male to be competing with people who are physiologically female. We know its am advantage, that is why we have seperate men's and women's sports vs co-ed.
If she has fully transitioned, then while I think there is some advantage, it isn't as much of an advantage.
+1. She should be allowed to compete and win.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not a fair competition. Women are really losing out these days for the sake of being pc.
This and I'm a liberal. Not sure how this became a PC thing?
+1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Had she transitioned hormonally?
In sport, I do think it provides a significant advantage for someone who is still physiologically a male to be competing with people who are physiologically female. We know its am advantage, that is why we have seperate men's and women's sports vs co-ed.
If she has fully transitioned, then while I think there is some advantage, it isn't as much of an advantage.
+1. She should be allowed to compete and win.
Anonymous wrote:Had she transitioned hormonally?
In sport, I do think it provides a significant advantage for someone who is still physiologically a male to be competing with people who are physiologically female. We know its am advantage, that is why we have seperate men's and women's sports vs co-ed.
If she has fully transitioned, then while I think there is some advantage, it isn't as much of an advantage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not a fair competition. Women are really losing out these days for the sake of being pc.
This and I'm a liberal. Not sure how this became a PC thing?
Anonymous wrote:Not a fair competition. Women are really losing out these days for the sake of being pc.