Anonymous wrote:Sure. So was I. Not to derail, but marriage grants a “presumed parentage” and because my wife and I are clearly unable to conceive without a donor, I protected myself by adopting my own children. I know it isn’t precisely the same, but it’s close.
Our lawyer suggested it as birth certificates aren’t seen in quite the same way legally now that DNA paternity/maternity can be proven. I’m only suggesting it as a way to protect herself if she’s truly worried about the genetic issue. I would assume the court would take into account that OP sustained the pregnancy and had her baby. And with what we are learning about epigenetics, she will shape the life of her baby in utero as well.
This is a very specific situation you have PP.
The question in this thread is if a woman gives birth to a child from donor eggs and husband's sperm, will husband have more rights in case of divorce. If you give birth, you can't adopt that child, you're his/her mother in the birth cert and legally. But what happens if there is a difficult custody battle and only one of the parents is genetically related to the child?