Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with a PP about reading 990s & that Catalogue for Philanthropy does a lot of vetting (if you are local to DC). You can also always designate your gift, ie say "I wish for this not to be used for communications but for direct relief to clients trying to pay their bail" or whatever.
Please don’t restrict your gift. NPOs need people, marketing, etc. to run.
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/nov/10/case-for-unrestricted-giving
Okay fine I get that. But all my law school classmates at nonprofits are damn bums, which is why reading 990s and stuff is not gonna cut it folks. I'm not talking about $250 I'm talking about more like $25,000.
Sorry to hear that. The lawyers at my nonprofit work 60 hours a week for less than an undergrad would make elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:What cause are you thinking about supporting OP? For example, I donate to disaster relief/medical crisis issues and I read the news and can see from articles sometimes which NGOs and relief organizations get on the ground fastest and to the hardest hit areas and who gets hammered for crazy inefficient spending (ex: typically the Red Cross). I like Doctors without Borders which works everywhere, even conflict zones most NGOs won't touch. For local DC area charities, I like Martha's Table and the Homeless Children's Playtime Project, but mostly because I've volunteered at both organizations and I can see they do good work for myself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with a PP about reading 990s & that Catalogue for Philanthropy does a lot of vetting (if you are local to DC). You can also always designate your gift, ie say "I wish for this not to be used for communications but for direct relief to clients trying to pay their bail" or whatever.
Please don’t restrict your gift. NPOs need people, marketing, etc. to run.
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/nov/10/case-for-unrestricted-giving
Okay fine I get that. But all my law school classmates at nonprofits are damn bums, which is why reading 990s and stuff is not gonna cut it folks. I'm not talking about $250 I'm talking about more like $25,000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with a PP about reading 990s & that Catalogue for Philanthropy does a lot of vetting (if you are local to DC). You can also always designate your gift, ie say "I wish for this not to be used for communications but for direct relief to clients trying to pay their bail" or whatever.
Please don’t restrict your gift. NPOs need people, marketing, etc. to run.
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/nov/10/case-for-unrestricted-giving
Okay fine I get that. But all my law school classmates at nonprofits are damn bums, which is why reading 990s and stuff is not gonna cut it folks. I'm not talking about $250 I'm talking about more like $25,000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree with a PP about reading 990s & that Catalogue for Philanthropy does a lot of vetting (if you are local to DC). You can also always designate your gift, ie say "I wish for this not to be used for communications but for direct relief to clients trying to pay their bail" or whatever.
Please don’t restrict your gift. NPOs need people, marketing, etc. to run.
https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/nov/10/case-for-unrestricted-giving
Anonymous wrote:I agree with a PP about reading 990s & that Catalogue for Philanthropy does a lot of vetting (if you are local to DC). You can also always designate your gift, ie say "I wish for this not to be used for communications but for direct relief to clients trying to pay their bail" or whatever.
Anonymous wrote:I only donate to orgs I have a personal connection with. I have very limited funds for donation (like ~250/year) and I know that my donation is nothing more than a token of support, so I'm not worried about efficacy.