Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"just move" isn't really answer. If somebody owns their home, transaction fees for realtors alone are 12% (6 on the sale, 6 on the buy).
McK is a little chaotic...well, a lot chaotic. When will that cause a real harm? I think soon. They are going to lose a kid, or one will get hurt; something.
As for why the McK teachers left, the word "bully" comes to mind...
Someone who obviously knows their way around real estate transactionsIt is 6%, 3 each - but many realtor commissions are trending towards 4.5% total.
Anonymous wrote:"just move" isn't really answer. If somebody owns their home, transaction fees for realtors alone are 12% (6 on the sale, 6 on the buy).
McK is a little chaotic...well, a lot chaotic. When will that cause a real harm? I think soon. They are going to lose a kid, or one will get hurt; something.
As for why the McK teachers left, the word "bully" comes to mind...
It is 6%, 3 each - but many realtor commissions are trending towards 4.5% total.Anonymous wrote:I heard rumor that McK was going to have 7. McK had 6 last year and 5 the previous two years. I think the total will climb then to 825. WHere's the breaking point?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It just has to hold on until 2021 (which I know isn't thrilling for the people currently living it). Once Reed opens, as long as the SB doesn't screw things up with option sites, I think one of the goals will be to get rid of trailers at McKinley.
As I pointed out a month or two ago that means over 1,000 kids will have spent part of all of their elementary experience in that disaster.
There's room at a few SA elementaries. Families in the MCKinley zone are choosing to live there and paying a premium to do so. Just move. That's what people tell SA families who aren't satisfied with their local school situation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just move isn’t that the solution always provided to S Arlington? Buck up buttercup Oakridge families seem to be able to function.
While Oakridge was at slightly higher building capacity this year than McKinley (120% vs. 118%), they had a much better situation than McKinley in certain respects. Oakridge's cafeteria capacity is about 50% greater than McKinley's, so it was at only 71% of its three-seating capacity this year while McKinley was at 106%. And for about the same number of students, Oakridge has four times as much available outdoor playspace for recess and other outdoor activities. Oakridge certainly has its cause for complaints, but let's be real about the relative situations.
Anonymous wrote:Just move isn’t that the solution always provided to S Arlington? Buck up buttercup Oakridge families seem to be able to function.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It just has to hold on until 2021 (which I know isn't thrilling for the people currently living it). Once Reed opens, as long as the SB doesn't screw things up with option sites, I think one of the goals will be to get rid of trailers at McKinley.
As I pointed out a month or two ago that means over 1,000 kids will have spent part of all of their elementary experience in that disaster.
Anonymous wrote:It just has to hold on until 2021 (which I know isn't thrilling for the people currently living it). Once Reed opens, as long as the SB doesn't screw things up with option sites, I think one of the goals will be to get rid of trailers at McKinley.