Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yup.
Sadly, this is called "being a heterosexual female."
Really baffling to me how men built empires, ran the world etc., given that so many seem incapable of even cooking dinner.
WTF? You do know up until about 50 years ago, women were the ones who ran the heart-and-household for all cultures. Men built those empires and dominated the world by using slave-and-unpaid household labor in the form of their wives, (girl) children, servants, actual slaves, etc.
Now you think that's suddenly going to change? Especially with the back-to-SAHM movement everyone's espousing? Yeah, no.
Anonymous wrote:I have a friend (now divorced) who was the adult in the household. He did all doctor appointments, permission slips, kid's activities, birthday parties, cleaning, repairing, yard work, etc. His ex-wife cooked and did laundry but that was it. She was a SAHM.
Anonymous wrote:The real reason DS is an only child is I can't handle taking care of any more kids, between DS and DH
Anonymous wrote:Yup.
Sadly, this is called "being a heterosexual female."
Really baffling to me how men built empires, ran the world etc., given that so many seem incapable of even cooking dinner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The real reason DS is an only child is I can't handle taking care of any more kids, between DS and DH
Do you feel resentful?
Anonymous wrote:The real reason DS is an only child is I can't handle taking care of any more kids, between DS and DH
Anonymous wrote:Yup.
Sadly, this is called "being a heterosexual female."
Really baffling to me how men built empires, ran the world etc., given that so many seem incapable of even cooking dinner.
Anonymous wrote:Yup.
Sadly, this is called "being a heterosexual female."
Really baffling to me how men built empires, ran the world etc., given that so many seem incapable of even cooking dinner.