Anonymous wrote:My mom didn’t protect me from her family
Then you are foolish and even perhaps a bad mother for having her watch your children. You don't trade free childcare for dysfunction.
My mom didn’t protect me from her family
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think when you are as blunt as you were with your mom then you invariably set up a fight, which it sounds like you now have. So my advice is to tone down the words in the future. Why throw oil on the flames?
You should not ever put your children in a situation where there is a sexual predator because you may not be able to protect them. However, for garden variety dysfunction, it can be helpful to expose your children in small doses so that they can have their own range of experiences and judgements. If you have been doing a good job as a parent, and it sounds like you have, then they will be able to read the signals and develop their own assessment of their relatives, and it most likely will coincide with yours. If you never expose them then you leave them open to being surprised one day by a relative or someone with similar patterns, and your kids may not have developed the skills to cope or repel the person.
I do question the wisdom of leaving your children with someone whom you feel did not protect you as a child. Has your mother changed that much? Or do you think that the situation is more controlled? It seems odd.
I agree with this. You did nothing wrong but it seems a little illogical to describe your parents who failed to protect you and are presumably connected to this dysfunctional family as somehow separate from it. Unless they also chose to distance themselves (which it sounds like is not the case since they want to go to this wedding), I have a hard time believing they totally have it together. But OP would be in a better position to judge that.
Anonymous wrote:So instead you are telling your mom she can't go?
No single weekend will ruin your kid's.
Anonymous wrote:I think when you are as blunt as you were with your mom then you invariably set up a fight, which it sounds like you now have. So my advice is to tone down the words in the future. Why throw oil on the flames?
You should not ever put your children in a situation where there is a sexual predator because you may not be able to protect them. However, for garden variety dysfunction, it can be helpful to expose your children in small doses so that they can have their own range of experiences and judgements. If you have been doing a good job as a parent, and it sounds like you have, then they will be able to read the signals and develop their own assessment of their relatives, and it most likely will coincide with yours. If you never expose them then you leave them open to being surprised one day by a relative or someone with similar patterns, and your kids may not have developed the skills to cope or repel the person.
I do question the wisdom of leaving your children with someone whom you feel did not protect you as a child. Has your mother changed that much? Or do you think that the situation is more controlled? It seems odd.
Anonymous wrote:Kids should not be around substance abusers or people who are not in control of themselves or saying inappropriate things around children.
Anonymous wrote:Op here. I would take the kids so my parents could attend the wedding. I just don’t want my kids to go.