Anonymous wrote:I can't believe you are really saying the root cause of problems in MoCo schools are engaged parents at the W schools. Come on. Although there have been issues, the stats at those schools are well above average and are in no way showing that there is a problem with kids learning. If your goal is to help schools with lower stats by moving the W kids around that is not a problem with the W schools but the home schools.
Anonymous wrote:I can't believe you are really saying the root cause of problems in MoCo schools are engaged parents at the W schools. Come on. Although there have been issues, the stats at those schools are well above average and are in no way showing that there is a problem with kids learning. If your goal is to help schools with lower stats by moving the W kids around that is not a problem with the W schools but the home schools.
Anonymous wrote:The article lacks data and substance. However given the one unnamed district used as an example, the school system kept their original course of action, ignored parental input, and remade school boundaries. Sounds like how MCPS likes to operate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is an article to link to, the next time somebody suggest that MCPS should just redo school boundaries. There's no "just" about it.
Yes people will protest, but that doesn’t mean that MCPS should do nothing or default to insufficient, short-term solutions, which is what they’re doing in many cases of overcrowded schools.
Anonymous wrote:This is an article to link to, the next time somebody suggest that MCPS should just redo school boundaries. There's no "just" about it.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, this a huge issue. Not the only one, but huge. The elephant in the room. W School Culture alarmed me enough as a teacher at a DCUM-lauded feeder MS, that I can’t imagine sending my own child there or the receiving HS.