Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’d much rather live next door to someone who crossed a desert to become an American than an American who wouldn’t cross the street to help a foreigner.
+1 very well said
And I may not love other children as much as I love my kids, but it doesn't mean I don't care if those other kids are not abused and loved. What kind of a-hole thinks this way?
Anonymous wrote:I’d much rather live next door to someone who crossed a desert to become an American than an American who wouldn’t cross the street to help a foreigner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He's wrong, though. When we take them from their parents, they become our responsibility. Even though DACA had an end date and has expired, these children are new recipients. Literally wards of the state.
He is both vile and ignorant--a nasty combination
Anonymous wrote:And you all love my kids just as much as you love yours?
Anonymous wrote:And you all love my kids just as much as you love yours?
Anonymous wrote:And you all love my kids just as much as you love yours?
Anonymous wrote:He's wrong, though. When we take them from their parents, they become our responsibility. Even though DACA had an end date and has expired, these children are new recipients. Literally wards of the state.
In his comments, Kilmeade defended Trump’s “zero tolerance” immigration policy as a way to send a message to would-be migrants in other countries. As for the separation of families, which could do real and lasting damage to many parents and children, Kilmeade brushed it off because the children aren’t Americans.
“Like it or not, these aren’t our kids,” Kilmeade said. “Show them compassion, but it’s not like he’s doing this to the people of Idaho or Texas. These are people from another country.”