Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the primary, de Ferranti, but only because he appears to have at least the vaguest inkling of our schools’ needs while Choun doesn’t appear to have any. Generally election, Vihstadt. He’s the only one who gets that we can’t leep loading up the county with high-density residential (affordable or not) without building more schools.
Yup, definitely Vihstadt overall. The candidates in the Dem primary have no idea what they are doing.
I'll hold my nose and vote for V. I didn't vote for him last time, but I'm not seeing anything from De Ferranti that makes me believe he will push back against the insanity of inviting thousands of families to live in CAFs, approving upzoning in GLUPs, and approving SFH lot subdivisions, and then pretending the kids are not here, or are just a temporary blip on the radar. The only way they will get the message is if we don't vote for their guy. No swim palace. I was fine with the idea, in theory, and voted for the bond. But nobody told me that my kids might have to go to HS in shifts at the time so that we could operate a swimming facility that will lose money every year.
Anonymous wrote:Both Dorsey and Cristol campaigned on the promise of more coordination with APS. I asked them and they both talked about it. Of course, Cristol didn't really say anything, it was all non-committal consultant speak, literally.
Vihstat is the only one who questions county spending, to include CAFs, aquatics etc. So, perhaps if he had been more than just ONE vote all the extra budget money at the end of the year (like $11 million or so) could have been used for schools, or something (like flooding in certain neighborhoods). Think of all the end of the year money that goes to the AFIH fund, like $10million a year. Over 4 years that a new elementary school! An underground parking garage!
The County wants to spend money to keep lower income families in Arlington, I get that. But that isn't leaving enough money for them to have a real seat in a real classroom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the primary, de Ferranti, but only because he appears to have at least the vaguest inkling of our schools’ needs while Choun doesn’t appear to have any. Generally election, Vihstadt. He’s the only one who gets that we can’t leep loading up the county with high-density residential (affordable or not) without building more schools.
Yup, definitely Vihstadt overall. The candidates in the Dem primary have no idea what they are doing.
I'll hold my nose and vote for V. I didn't vote for him last time, but I'm not seeing anything from De Ferranti that makes me believe he will push back against the insanity of inviting thousands of families to live in CAFs, approving upzoning in GLUPs, and approving SFH lot subdivisions, and then pretending the kids are not here, or are just a temporary blip on the radar. The only way they will get the message is if we don't vote for their guy. No swim palace. I was fine with the idea, in theory, and voted for the bond. But nobody told me that my kids might have to go to HS in shifts at the time so that we could operate a swimming facility that will lose money every year.
This all day long!
Anonymous wrote:Met de Feranti yesterday while he was door knocking. He says the right things about need to have the County Board more involved with the School Board problems. Whether he would be able to follow through is impossible to know.
I'm not convinced that Vihstadt is super helpful here. He is very committed to having the county become more involved with additional affordable housing. That may be creating more issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the primary, de Ferranti, but only because he appears to have at least the vaguest inkling of our schools’ needs while Choun doesn’t appear to have any. Generally election, Vihstadt. He’s the only one who gets that we can’t leep loading up the county with high-density residential (affordable or not) without building more schools.
Yup, definitely Vihstadt overall. The candidates in the Dem primary have no idea what they are doing.
I'll hold my nose and vote for V. I didn't vote for him last time, but I'm not seeing anything from De Ferranti that makes me believe he will push back against the insanity of inviting thousands of families to live in CAFs, approving upzoning in GLUPs, and approving SFH lot subdivisions, and then pretending the kids are not here, or are just a temporary blip on the radar. The only way they will get the message is if we don't vote for their guy. No swim palace. I was fine with the idea, in theory, and voted for the bond. But nobody told me that my kids might have to go to HS in shifts at the time so that we could operate a swimming facility that will lose money every year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the primary, de Ferranti, but only because he appears to have at least the vaguest inkling of our schools’ needs while Choun doesn’t appear to have any. Generally election, Vihstadt. He’s the only one who gets that we can’t leep loading up the county with high-density residential (affordable or not) without building more schools.
Yup, definitely Vihstadt overall. The candidates in the Dem primary have no idea what they are doing.
Anonymous wrote:Met de Feranti yesterday while he was door knocking. He says the right things about need to have the County Board more involved with the School Board problems. Whether he would be able to follow through is impossible to know.
I'm not convinced that Vihstadt is super helpful here. He is very committed to having the county become more involved with additional affordable housing. That may be creating more issues.
Anonymous wrote:In the primary, de Ferranti, but only because he appears to have at least the vaguest inkling of our schools’ needs while Choun doesn’t appear to have any. Generally election, Vihstadt. He’s the only one who gets that we can’t leep loading up the county with high-density residential (affordable or not) without building more schools.