Anonymous wrote:Be careful not to presume that things in the vast majority of the country are as expensive as they are in DC and its inner suburbs.
Anonymous wrote:I vote the opposite. DH and I are financially MUCH better off having married in our early 20s and continued to work through having children. We easily have 3x the savings rate of our single friends.
Anonymous wrote:It just depends on your expectations. If you expect to buy a nice house at 30 with kids, then yes it's too expensive for most people.
If you are willing to have a starter home, or condo with kids, I think it's doable, even in DC area.
I see too many younger adults think they should be able to afford the same things that a 40+ yr old has. I had this conversation with another person. They are much younger than my DH and I. I reminded this person that we are much much older, and we are at a different stage in our lives.
Anonymous wrote:Are we starting to reach the point where it is just too expensive and no longer worth it?
Sure there is the welfare and government assistance option but I am talking about for the average person and/or couple.
Anonymous wrote:Be careful not to presume that things in the vast majority of the country are as expensive as they are in DC and its inner suburbs.
Anonymous wrote:Housing, housing, housing.
We have exited the golden age of the post-war era, when incomes were rising for the fat middle of the population and housing was relatively affordable. As suggested by the PP, most people under 30 cannot buy a single family house in a decent school district within a 20 minute commute of their job.
The data suggest that more and more people think they will not do as well financially as their parents. And they are deciding not to have kids.