Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 20:48     Subject: Re:Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

Are this WISC IV or WISC V. Also, which grade is your kid.
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 20:04     Subject: Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

I wouldn't submit the WISC. It doesn't help your case since it's the lowest score.
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 20:00     Subject: Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

Nope. Unfortunately the CoGAT scores are below the cutoff and GBRS is also not high enough.
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 18:15     Subject: Re:Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

Anonymous wrote:The child was not in pool with those scores. Needed 132.


The NNAT is above 132. Why was the child not in pool?
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 18:05     Subject: Re:Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

The child was not in pool with those scores. Needed 132.
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 17:24     Subject: Re:Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:she is in 2nd grade. Thanks.


Was she accepted?


Why make this post if she was accepted already?


Maybe, but also why make this post and not be clear what was rejected and what is new for appeal?

I’m relatively new to AAP and this board but know people will want to know which info was included originally, what is new, and is the WISC GMU or private as well as what subscores were. Those all seem to be asked on these types of posts.


I agree. The question should be clear.
Was the WISC done before or after being rejected? Not that it matters but Im curious because the kid seems to be a pool kid and I dont know why people have this idea that you have to get a WISC to appeal. WISC helps if the kid is NOT in the pool.
Other things like work samples and recommendations matter more if the kid is in pool and got rejected. Also GBRS but theres nothing you can do about that.
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 15:48     Subject: Re:Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:she is in 2nd grade. Thanks.


Was she accepted?


Why make this post if she was accepted already?


Maybe, but also why make this post and not be clear what was rejected and what is new for appeal?

I’m relatively new to AAP and this board but know people will want to know which info was included originally, what is new, and is the WISC GMU or private as well as what subscores were. Those all seem to be asked on these types of posts.
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 15:16     Subject: Re:Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:she is in 2nd grade. Thanks.


Was she accepted?


Why make this post if she was accepted already?
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 15:08     Subject: Re:Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

Anonymous wrote:she is in 2nd grade. Thanks.


Was she accepted?
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 15:03     Subject: Re:Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

she is in 2nd grade. Thanks.
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 14:47     Subject: Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

Anonymous wrote:those scores look like a mathy kid who will do well in advanced math


"Mathy?" Are you 12?
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 14:27     Subject: Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

those scores look like a mathy kid who will do well in advanced math
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 14:24     Subject: Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

those scores look like a kid who has done a lot of test prep
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 14:22     Subject: Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

What grade? Were you accepted or rejected?
Anonymous
Post 05/08/2018 14:11     Subject: Any chances getting in GT program with the following scores.

with the below scores of

NNAT 99% 140
COGAT 130
WISC 123
GBRS 9

Any chances of getting into the GT program.

Thanks.